These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

230 related items for PubMed ID: 26075675

  • 1. Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Marino R, Lampacher P, Dittrich G, Tavora-Vieira D, Kuthubutheen J, Rajan GP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26075675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R, Dalhoff E, Heyd A, Wildenstein D, Hagen R, Gummer AW, Schraven SP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP, Lampacher P, Ambett R, Dittrich G, Kuthubutheen J, Wood B, McArthur A, Marino R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016 Jun; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM, Jung J, Moon IS, Kim SH, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.
    Beltrame AM, Todt I, Sprinzl G, Profant M, Schwab B.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Oct; 123(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 24842869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Surgical Impact of Coupling an Active Middle Ear Implant to Short Incus Process.
    Schraven SP, Rak K, Cebulla M, Radeloff A, Grossmann W, Hagen R, Mlynski R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jul; 39(6):688-692. PubMed ID: 29879088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Standardized Active Middle-Ear Implant Coupling to the Short Incus Process.
    Mlynski R, Dalhoff E, Heyd A, Wildenstein D, Rak K, Radeloff A, Hagen R, Gummer AW, Schraven SP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(8):1390-8. PubMed ID: 26247138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Schnabl J, Koci V.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.