These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 26103711

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Senate removes abortion option for young girls.
    Hulse C.
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul 26; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 16909491
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003 Jul 26; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Minors' behavioral responses to parental involvement laws: delaying abortion until age 18.
    Colman S, Joyce T.
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2009 Jun 26; 41(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 19493221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W.
    Akron Law Rev; 1983 Jun 26; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof.
    Webster RD, Neustadt AN, Whitaker AK, Gilliam ML.
    Contraception; 2010 Oct 26; 82(4):310-3. PubMed ID: 20851223
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The National Health Act and refusal of consent to health services by children.
    McQuoid-Mason D.
    S Afr Med J; 2006 Jun 26; 96(6):530-2. PubMed ID: 16841137
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998 Jun 26; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
    Hayhurst MB.
    Mont Law Rev; 1997 Jun 26; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.