These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
306 related items for PubMed ID: 26115309
21. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Eliasziw M, Smith RF, Singh N, Holdsworth DW, Fox AJ, Barnett HJ. Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2445-9. PubMed ID: 7974588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis. Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Verma H, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS. Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Agreement of intracranial vessel diameters measured on 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography using an automatic windowing algorithm. Abe Y, Yuki I, Otani K, Shoji T, Ishibashi T, Murayama Y. J Neuroradiol; 2021 Jun; 48(4):311-315. PubMed ID: 31563590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the detection of carotid stenosis: a histopathological study of 123 cases. Netuka D, Benes V, Mandys V, Hlásenská J, Burkert J, Benes V. Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 May; 148(5):511-20; discussion 520. PubMed ID: 16523222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, Michaely HJ, Waggershauser T, Ittrich C, Dietrich O, Reiser MF. Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography. Anzidei M, Napoli A, Marincola BC, Nofroni I, Geiger D, Zaccagna F, Catalano C, Passariello R. Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The accuracy of angiography and CT angiography of the carotid bifurcation compared to macro-morphological correlation]. Post K, Eckstein HH, Hoffmann E, Volke A, Post S, Allenberg JR, Kauffmann GW. Rofo; 1996 Mar; 164(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 8672773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. NASCET percent stenosis semi-automated versus manual measurement on CTA. Lian K, White JH, Bartlett ES, Bharatha A, Aviv RI, Fox AJ, Symons SP. Can J Neurol Sci; 2012 May; 39(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 22547515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The initial results of spiral CT angiography in demonstrating stenoses of the a. carotis]. Link J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Brossmann J, Grabener M, Voss C, Heller M. Rofo; 1995 Mar; 162(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 7718774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences between MIP and MPR techniques in the carotid artery stenosis degree measurement. Evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiograph. Saba L, Mallarini G. Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 18432165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]