These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF, Bass D, Herdman C, Kinney T, Gupta K, Wolf L, Dewar T, Deas TM, Mehta MK, Anwer MB, Pellish R, Hamilton JK, Polter D, Reddy KG, Hanan I. Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study. Sola-Vera J, Catalá L, Uceda F, Picó MD, Pérez Rabasco E, Sáez J, Jiménez N, Arjona MD, Fernández M, Girona E, García-Sepulcre MF. Endoscopy; 2019 Aug; 51(8):742-749. PubMed ID: 31096275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ng SC, Tsoi KK, Hirai HW, Lee YT, Wu JC, Sung JJ, Chan FK, Lau JY. Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 107(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 22664471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Endocuff-assisted versus Cap-assisted Colonoscopy in Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate. A Meta-analysis. Facciorusso A, Buccino VR, Sacco R. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2020 Sep 09; 29(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 32830810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Farewell to the cap or is there still an indication? Kanakadandi V, Rastogi A. Endoscopy; 2015 Oct 09; 47(10):873-5. PubMed ID: 26417969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled studies. Rondonotti E, Zolk O, Amato A, Paggi S, Baccarin A, Spinzi G, Radaelli F. Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec 09; 80(6):1103-12.e2. PubMed ID: 25053528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cap assisted colonoscopy for the detection of serrated polyps: a post-hoc analysis. Rzouq F, Gupta N, Wani S, Sharma P, Bansal A, Rastogi A. BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Feb 05; 15():11. PubMed ID: 25652842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study. De Palma GD, Giglio MC, Bruzzese D, Gennarelli N, Maione F, Siciliano S, Manzo B, Cassese G, Luglio G. Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan 05; 87(1):232-240. PubMed ID: 28082115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. Tee HP, Corte C, Al-Ghamdi H, Prakoso E, Darke J, Chettiar R, Rahman W, Davison S, Griffin SP, Selby WS, Kaffes AJ. World J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug 21; 16(31):3905-10. PubMed ID: 20712051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis. Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino RV, Della Valle N, Nacchiero MC, Monica F, Cannizzaro R, Muscatiello N. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug 21; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Not Available]. Lesur G. Endoscopy; 2015 Oct 21; 47(10):965. PubMed ID: 26693529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Expanding the view of a standard colonoscope with the Third Eye Panoramic cap. Rubin M, Lurie L, Bose K, Kim SH. World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct 07; 21(37):10683-7. PubMed ID: 26457029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]