These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study. Winkel RR, von Euler-Chelpin M, Nielsen M, Petersen K, Lillholm M, Nielsen MB, Lynge E, Uldall WY, Vejborg I. BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul 07; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a fully-automated parenchymal analysis software for breast cancer risk assessment: A pilot study in a Finnish sample. Pertuz S, Sassi A, Holli-Helenius K, Kämäräinen J, Rinta-Kiikka I, Lääperi AL, Arponen O. Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec 07; 121():108710. PubMed ID: 31689665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk. Tan M, Pu J, Cheng S, Liu H, Zheng B. Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct 07; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Lan L. Acad Radiol; 2007 May 07; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment. Kontos D, Ikejimba LC, Bakic PR, Troxel AB, Conant EF, Maidment AD. Radiology; 2011 Oct 07; 261(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 21771961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations. Gastounioti A, Oustimov A, Keller BM, Pantalone L, Hsieh MK, Conant EF, Kontos D. Med Phys; 2016 Nov 07; 43(11):5862. PubMed ID: 27806604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial. Ray S, Chen L, Keller BM, Chen J, Conant EF, Kontos D. Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug 07; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status. Malkov S, Shepherd JA, Scott CG, Tamimi RM, Ma L, Bertrand KA, Couch F, Jensen MR, Mahmoudzadeh AP, Fan B, Norman A, Brandt KR, Pankratz VS, Vachon CM, Kerlikowske K. Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec 06; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography. Keller BM, Chen J, Daye D, Conant EF, Kontos D. Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug 25; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]