These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
240 related items for PubMed ID: 26150704
1. Randomized comparative study of left versus right radial approach in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Fu Q, Hu H, Wang D, Chen W, Tan Z, Li Q, Chen B. Clin Interv Aging; 2015; 10():1003-8. PubMed ID: 26150704 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Larsen P, Shah S, Waxman S, Freilich M, Riskalla N, Piemonte T, Jeon C, Pyne C. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul 01; 78(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20939041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between Right Versus Left Radial Arterial Access in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Elmahdy MF, ElMaghawry M, Hassan M, Kassem HH, Said K, Elfaramawy AA. Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Jan 01; 26(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27374862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study. Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Sarandrea A, Summaria F, Pendenza G, Tommasino A, Patrizi R, Mazzari M, Mongiardo R, Lioy E. Am Heart J; 2011 Jan 01; 161(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 21167351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between the Right and Left Radial Artery Approaches from the Korean Transradial Coronary Intervention Registry. Park JY, Rha SW, Choi BG, Oh DJ, Choi CU, Youn YJ, Yoon J. Yonsei Med J; 2017 May 01; 58(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28332356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparison of left and right radial approach for percutaneous coronary angiography in Asian populations. Hu H, Fu Q, Chen W, Wang D, Hua X, Chen B. Clin Interv Aging; 2014 May 01; 9():963-8. PubMed ID: 25018624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation Exposure of the Operator During Coronary Interventions (from the RADIO Study). Kallinikou Z, Puricel SG, Ryckx N, Togni M, Baeriswyl G, Stauffer JC, Cook S, Verdun FR, Goy JJ. Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jul 15; 118(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 27239022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study. Dominici M, Diletti R, Milici C, Bock C, Placanica A, D'Alessandro G, Arrivi A, Italiani M, Buono E, Boschetti E. Heart; 2013 Apr 15; 99(7):480-4. PubMed ID: 23343690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation. Kado H, Patel AM, Suryadevara S, Zenni MM, Box LC, Angiolillo DJ, Bass TA, Guzman LA. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul 15; 7(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 24954573 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure). Pancholy SB, Joshi P, Shah S, Rao SV, Bertrand OF, Patel TM. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug 17; 8(9):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 26210808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures through the left or right radial approach: the TALENT dosimetric substudy. Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Burzotta F, Sarandrea A, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Rao S, Lioy E. Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jun 17; 4(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 21586692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized study comparing the effectiveness of right and left radial approach for coronary angiography. Norgaz T, Gorgulu S, Dagdelen S. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug 01; 80(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22334420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, Mates M, Pesek J, Ostadal P, Hrabos V, Dusek J, Koza J, Sembera Z, Brtko M, Aschermann O, Smid M, Polansky P, Al Mawiri A, Vojacek J, Bis J, Costerousse O, Bertrand OF, Rokyta R. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Mar 18; 63(10):964-72. PubMed ID: 24211309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect on door-to-balloon time of immediate transradial percutaneous coronary intervention on culprit lesion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared to diagnostic angiography followed by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Plourde G, Abdelaal E, Bataille Y, MacHaalany J, Déry JP, Déry U, Larose É, De Larochellière R, Gleeton O, Barbeau G, Roy L, Costerousse O, Bertrand OF. Am J Cardiol; 2013 Mar 15; 111(6):836-40. PubMed ID: 23313341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI). Gellen B, Lesault PF, Canouï-Poitrine F, Champagne S, Mouillet G, Pongas D, Le Thuaut A, Jakljevic T, Boudiche S, de la Vega M, Maalej A, Veugeois A, Dubois-Randé JL, Teiger E. Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep 30; 168(2):1056-61. PubMed ID: 23159410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry. Bauer T, Hochadel M, Brachmann J, Schächinger V, Boekstegers P, Zrenner B, Zahn R, Zeymer U, Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitende kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct 30; 86 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 25945803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, Schweizer M, Blevins A, Girotra S, Horwitz PA. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug 30; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Steg PG, Natarajan MK, Cheema AN, Rao SV, Cantor WJ, Džavík V, Budaj A, Sheth T, Valentin V, Fung A, Widimsky P, Ferrari E, Gao P, Jedrzejowski B, Mehta SR, RIVAL Investigators. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar 30; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23517837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sheathless guide catheter in transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Miyasaka M, Tada N, Kato S, Kami M, Horie K, Honda T, Takizawa K, Otomo T, Inoue N. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May 30; 87(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 26354160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Operator radiation exposure during right or left transradial coronary angiography: A phantom study. Sciahbasi A, Rigattieri S, Sarandrea A, Cera M, Di Russo C, Fedele S, Romano S, Pugliese FR, Penco M. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 May 30; 16(7):386-90. PubMed ID: 26235976 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]