These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

921 related items for PubMed ID: 26151240

  • 61. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
    Angeja AC, Washington AE, Vargas JE, Gomez R, Rojas I, Caughey AB.
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request.
    Kingdon C, Neilson J, Singleton V, Gyte G, Hart A, Gabbay M, Lavender T.
    BJOG; 2009 Jun; 116(7):886-95. PubMed ID: 19385961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Factors influencing the mode of delivery and associated pregnancy outcomes for twins: a retrospective cohort study in a public hospital.
    Liu AL, Yung WK, Yeung HN, Lai SF, Lam MT, Lai FK, Lo TK, Lau WL, Leung WC.
    Hong Kong Med J; 2012 Apr; 18(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 22477732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. [Moving beyond the ethical tension of caesarean section on maternal request].
    Schantz C, Lhotte M, Pantelias AC.
    Sante Publique; 2020 Apr; 32(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 33723955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. Healthcare professionals' views on two computer-based decision aids for women choosing mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: a qualitative study.
    Rees KM, Shaw AR, Bennert K, Emmett CL, Montgomery AA.
    BJOG; 2009 Jun; 116(7):906-14. PubMed ID: 19522794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J, van der Does CD.
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995 Jun; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Scottish female obstetricians' views on elective caesarean section and personal choice for delivery.
    MacDonald C, Pinion SB, MacLeod UM.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Nov; 22(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 12554241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.
    Graham WJ, Hundley V, McCheyne AL, Hall MH, Gurney E, Milne J.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10426639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 47.