These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


153 related items for PubMed ID: 26154149

  • 21. Establishing the Minimum Intensity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Superconditioning Pulses to Effect Inhibition and Facilitation of Motor Evoked Potentials.
    Calancie BM, Chin S, Wang D.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 May 01; 40(4):331-338. PubMed ID: 34482314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reliability of diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Welch JF, Argento PJ, Mitchell GS, Fox EJ.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2020 Dec 01; 129(6):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 33031020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Spread of electrical activity at cortical level after repetitive magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.
    Lorenzano C, Gilio F, Inghilleri M, Conte A, Fofi L, Manfredi M, Berardelli A.
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov 01; 147(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12410333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Test-retest reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the submental muscle group during volitional swallowing.
    Doeltgen SH, Ridding MC, O'Beirne GA, Dalrymple-Alford J, Huckabee ML.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Mar 30; 178(1):134-7. PubMed ID: 19118575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Reliability of TMS-related measures of tibialis anterior muscle in patients with chronic stroke and healthy subjects.
    Cacchio A, Paoloni M, Cimini N, Mangone M, Liris G, Aloisi P, Santilli V, Marrelli A.
    J Neurol Sci; 2011 Apr 15; 303(1-2):90-4. PubMed ID: 21262510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Downregulating Aberrant Motor Evoked Potential Synergies of the Lower Extremity Post Stroke During TMS of the Contralesional Hemisphere.
    Tan AQ, Shemmell J, Dhaher YY.
    Brain Stimul; 2016 Apr 15; 9(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 26927733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Facilitatory conditioning of the supplementary motor area in humans enhances the corticophrenic responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Raux M, Xie H, Similowski T, Koski L.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2010 Jan 15; 108(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 19892923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Electrical and magnetic repetitive transcranial stimulation of the primary motor cortex in healthy subjects.
    Gilio F, Iacovelli E, Frasca V, Gabriele M, Giacomelli E, De Lena C, Cipriani AM, Inghilleri M.
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 May 08; 455(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19429094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability.
    Goldsworthy MR, Hordacre B, Ridding MC.
    Neuroscience; 2016 Apr 21; 320():205-9. PubMed ID: 26872998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Absence of a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Lower Limb Corticomotor Response Does Not Affect Walking Speed in Chronic Stroke Survivors.
    Sivaramakrishnan A, Madhavan S.
    Stroke; 2018 Aug 21; 49(8):2004-2007. PubMed ID: 29986928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.
    van Hedel HJ, Murer C, Dietz V, Curt A.
    J Neurol; 2007 Aug 21; 254(8):1089-98. PubMed ID: 17431701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effects of non-target leg activation, TMS coil orientation, and limb dominance on lower limb motor cortex excitability.
    Smith MC, Stinear JW, Alan Barber P, Stinear CM.
    Brain Res; 2017 Jan 15; 1655():10-16. PubMed ID: 27840187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F, Musumeci G, Navarra R, Di Lazzaro V, Caulo M, Uncini A.
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr 15; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
    Ataoglu EE, Caglayan HB, Cengiz B.
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep 15; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Motor function in multiple sclerosis assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping.
    Bardel B, Créange A, Bonardet N, Bapst B, Zedet M, Wahab A, Ayache SS, Lefaucheur JP.
    J Neurol; 2024 Jul 15; 271(7):4513-4528. PubMed ID: 38709305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy elderly people.
    Matamala JM, Núñez C, Lera L, Verdugo RJ, Sánchez H, Albala C, Castillo JL.
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Dec 15; 30(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 23767989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Facilitation of corticospinal connections in able-bodied people and people with central nervous system disorders using eight interventions.
    Stein RB, Everaert DG, Roy FD, Chong S, Soleimani M.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Feb 15; 30(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 23377445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Intra and inter-session reliability of rapid Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation stimulus-response curves of tibialis anterior muscle in healthy older adults.
    Peri E, Ambrosini E, Colombo VM, van de Ruit M, Grey MJ, Monticone M, Ferriero G, Pedrocchi A, Ferrigno G, Ferrante S.
    PLoS One; 2017 Feb 15; 12(9):e0184828. PubMed ID: 28910370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Optimum interpulse interval for transcranial electrical train stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials of maximal amplitude in both upper and lower extremity target muscles.
    van Hal C, Hoebink E, Polak HE, Racz I, de Kleuver M, Journee HL.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Oct 15; 124(10):2054-9. PubMed ID: 23735307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent.
    Raco V, Bauer R, Norim S, Gharabaghi A.
    Brain Stimul; 2017 Oct 15; 10(6):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 28779945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.