These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 26169192

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.
    Halldorsdottir S, Warchal-Windham ME, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Parkes JL, Simmons DA.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep 01; 7(5):1294-304. PubMed ID: 24124957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
    Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, Schmid V, Grenningloh M, Forst T, Pfützner A.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr 01; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G, Pleus S, Link M, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Högel J, Haug C.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep 01; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of hematocrit interference with MyStar extra and seven competitive devices.
    Demircik F, Ramljak S, Hermanns I, Pfützner A, Pfützner A.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar 01; 9(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 25549636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of bolus insulin dose errors based on results of a clinical trial of five blood glucose monitoring systems.
    Pardo S, Dunne N, Simmons DA.
    Ther Deliv; 2019 Dec 01; 10(12):793-799. PubMed ID: 31789119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range.
    Zijlstra E, Heinemann L, Fischer A, Kapitza C.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov 01; 10(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 27605592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Petruschke T.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct 07; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S, Grady M, Mackintosh S, Donald R, Levy B.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep 07; 12(5):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 29845873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Rittmeyer D, Pleus S, Haug C.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr 07; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.