These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

685 related items for PubMed ID: 26169638

  • 21. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.
    Albayati S, Hitos K, Berney CR, Morgan MJ, Pathma-Nathan N, El-Khoury T, Richardson A, Chu DI, Cannon J, Kennedy G, Toh JWT.
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 36269488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes After Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection.
    Al-Mazrou AM, Baser O, Kiran RP.
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(6):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29404985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. 30-Day Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Proctocolectomy with Ileoanal Anastomosis in Children and Young Adults: A Combined Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Pediatric and Adult Databases.
    Kauffman JD, Snyder CW, Danielson PD, Chandler NM.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Mar; 29(3):402-408. PubMed ID: 30481105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP database analysis.
    Harr JN, Haskins IN, Amdur RL, Agarwal S, Obias V.
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 28900886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Farah E, Abreu AA, Rail B, Salgado J, Karagkounis G, Zeh HJ, Polanco PM.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug 30; 21(1):272. PubMed ID: 37644538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Conversion in mini-invasive colorectal surgery: the effect of timing on short term outcome.
    Caputo D, Caricato M, La Vaccara V, Capolupo GT, Coppola R.
    Int J Surg; 2014 Aug 30; 12(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 25010603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations.
    Casillas MA, Leichtle SW, Wahl WL, Lampman RM, Welch KB, Wellock T, Madden EB, Cleary RK.
    Am J Surg; 2014 Jul 30; 208(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24239530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Rectal prolapse in the elderly: trends in surgical management and outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Clark CE, Jupiter DC, Thomas JS, Papaconstantinou HT.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Nov 30; 215(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 22917645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Minimally invasive right versus left colectomy for cancer: does robotic surgery mitigate differences in short-term outcomes?
    Nasseri Y, Kasheri E, Oka K, Cox B, Cohen J, Ellenhorn J, Barnajian M.
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug 30; 16(4):875-881. PubMed ID: 34581955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Initial experience of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a matched case-control study.
    de'Angelis N, Alghamdi S, Renda A, Azoulay D, Brunetti F.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct 09; 13():295. PubMed ID: 26452727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
    Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, Chung BI.
    Urology; 2013 Sep 09; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N, Woolas R, Brinkmann D.
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep 09; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Kannan U, Reddy VS, Mukerji AN, Parithivel VS, Shah AK, Gilchrist BF, Farkas DT.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec 07; 21(45):12843-50. PubMed ID: 26668508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluating quality across minimally invasive platforms in colorectal surgery.
    Keller DS, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Ibarra S, Madhoun N, Tahilramani R, Mahmood A, Haas EM.
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun 07; 30(6):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26416377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Robotic Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Comparison of Outcomes from a Single Institution with the ACS-NSQIP Database.
    Ju T, Haskins IN, Kuang X, Amdur RL, Brody FJ, Obias V, Agarwal S.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan 07; 29(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30096003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
    Gorgun E, Ozben V, Costedio M, Stocchi L, Kalady M, Remzi F.
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov 07; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients.
    Ahmed J, Cao H, Panteleimonitis S, Khan J, Parvaiz A.
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec 07; 19(12):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 28644545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Rates, trends, and short-term outcomes of colorectal resections for endometriosis: An ACS-NSQIP review.
    Thiels CA, Shenoy CC, Ubl DS, Habermann EB, Kelley SR, Mathis KL.
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jul 07; 31():5-9. PubMed ID: 27212593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Risk of readmission after laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery.
    Esemuede IO, Gabre-Kidan A, Fowler DL, Kiran RP.
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Nov 07; 30(11):1489-94. PubMed ID: 26264049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.