These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

298 related items for PubMed ID: 26188884

  • 1. Antimicrobial dressings: Comparison of the ability of a panel of dressings to prevent biofilm formation by key burn wound pathogens.
    Halstead FD, Rauf M, Bamford A, Wearn CM, Bishop JRB, Burt R, Fraise AP, Moiemen NS, Oppenheim BA, Webber MA.
    Burns; 2015 Dec; 41(8):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 26188884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vitro activity of an engineered honey, medical-grade honeys, and antimicrobial wound dressings against biofilm-producing clinical bacterial isolates.
    Halstead FD, Webber MA, Rauf M, Burt R, Dryden M, Oppenheim BA.
    J Wound Care; 2016 Feb; 25(2):93-4, 96-102. PubMed ID: 26878302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Acetic acid dressings used to treat pseudomonas colonised burn wounds: A UK national survey.
    Nour S, Reid G, Sathanantham K, Mackie I.
    Burns; 2022 Sep; 48(6):1364-1367. PubMed ID: 34862089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of silver-coated dressing (Acticoat), chlorhexidine acetate 0.5% (Bactigrass), and silver sulfadiazine 1% (Silverdin) for topical antibacterial effect in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-contaminated, full-skin thickness burn wounds in rats.
    Ulkür E, Oncül O, Karagöz H, Celiköz B, Cavuşlu S.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 26(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 16151289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
    Scully R, Hurlow J, Walker M, Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler P.
    J Wound Care; 2018 Sep 02; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of three different topical antibacterial dressings on Acinetobacter baumannii-contaminated full-thickness burns in rats.
    Uygur F, Oncül O, Evinç R, Diktas H, Acar A, Ulkür E.
    Burns; 2009 Mar 02; 35(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 18789593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel silver hydrogel dressing compared to two common silver burn wound dressings: Acticoat™ and PolyMem Silver(®).
    Boonkaew B, Kempf M, Kimble R, Supaphol P, Cuttle L.
    Burns; 2014 Feb 02; 40(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 23790588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties.
    Martineau L, Shek PN.
    Burns; 2006 Mar 02; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of internally validated in vitro biofilm models to assess antibiofilm performance of silver-containing gelling fibre dressings.
    Suleman L, Purcell L, Thomas H, Westgate S.
    J Wound Care; 2020 Mar 02; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.
    Tran PL, Hamood AN, de Souza A, Schultz G, Liesenfeld B, Mehta D, Reid TW.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2015 Mar 02; 23(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 25469865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
    Phillips PL, Yang Q, Davis S, Sampson EM, Azeke JI, Hamad A, Schultz GS.
    Int Wound J; 2015 Aug 02; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Next science wound gel technology, a novel agent that inhibits biofilm development by gram-positive and gram-negative wound pathogens.
    Miller KG, Tran PL, Haley CL, Kruzek C, Colmer-Hamood JA, Myntti M, Hamood AN.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2014 Jun 02; 58(6):3060-72. PubMed ID: 24637684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.
    Hill KE, Malic S, McKee R, Rennison T, Harding KG, Williams DW, Thomas DW.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun 02; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the efficacy of silver-based antimicrobial burn dressings in a porcine model of burn wounds.
    Ross JA, Allan N, Olson M, Schatz C, Nation PN, Gawaziuk JP, Sethi J, Liu S, Logsetty S.
    Burns; 2020 Nov 02; 46(7):1632-1640. PubMed ID: 32381448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Suprathel-acetic acid matrix versus acticoat and aquacel as an antiseptic dressing: an in vitro study.
    Ryssel H, Germann G, Riedel K, Reichenberger M, Hellmich S, Kloeters O.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Oct 02; 65(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 20798627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
    Robertson SN, Romero M, Fenn S, Kohler Riedi PL, Cámara M.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar 01; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.