These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

540 related items for PubMed ID: 26194306

  • 1. Discrepancies in Left Ventricular Mass Calculation Based on Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Measurements in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.
    Seo HY, Lee SP, Park JB, Lee JM, Park EA, Chang SA, Kim HK, Park SJ, Lee W, Kim YJ, Lee SC, Park SW, Sohn DW, Choe YH.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1194-1203, e2. PubMed ID: 26194306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients.
    Grebe SJ, Malzahn U, Donhauser J, Liu D, Wanner C, Krane V, Hammer F.
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2020 Sep 16; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 32938484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
    Barone-Rochette G, Piérard S, Seldrum S, de Meester de Ravenstein C, Melchior J, Maes F, Pouleur AC, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov 16; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging versus echocardiography to ascertain the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: results of the REST study.
    Breitenbach I, Harringer W, Tsui S, Amorim MJ, Herregods MC, Bogaert J, Goiti JJ, Gerosa G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Sep 16; 144(3):640-645.e1. PubMed ID: 22154789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Noninvasive detection of fibrosis applying contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in different forms of left ventricular hypertrophy relation to remodeling.
    Rudolph A, Abdel-Aty H, Bohl S, Boyé P, Zagrosek A, Dietz R, Schulz-Menger J.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Jan 20; 53(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 19147047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C, Bollache E, Kachenoura N, Perdrix L, Hrynchyshyn N, Bruguière E, Redheuil A, Diebold B, Mousseaux E.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep 01; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Gender difference in ventricular response to aortic stenosis: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Lee JM, Park SJ, Lee SP, Park E, Chang SA, Kim HK, Lee W, Kim YJ, Lee SC, Park SW, Sohn DW, Choe YH.
    PLoS One; 2015 Sep 01; 10(3):e0121684. PubMed ID: 25811358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in preoperative assessment of aortic stenosis--case report].
    Pasowicz M, Klimeczek P, Wicher-Muniak E, Kolasa-Trela R, Podolec P, Tracz W, Sadowski J.
    Przegl Lek; 2004 Sep 01; 61(6):596-9. PubMed ID: 15724643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of Regional Upper Septal Hypertrophy on Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass and Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis.
    Guzzetti E, Tastet L, Annabi MS, Capoulade R, Shen M, Bernard J, García J, Le Ven F, Arsenault M, Bédard E, Larose E, Clavel MA, Pibarot P.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 Jan 01; 34(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 33067075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring: correlation between blood pressure variability and left ventricular hypertrophy in untreated hypertensive patients.
    Feola M, Boffano GM, Procopio M, Reynaud S, Allemano P, Rizzi G.
    G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Jan 01; 28(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9493044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Left Ventricular Mass, Myocardial Structure, and Function in Severe Aortic Stenosis: an Echocardiographic and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.
    Craft J, Weber J, Cao JJ, Passick M, Ngai N, Bond K, Khalique OK, Barasch E.
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Oct 15; 205():311-320. PubMed ID: 37633066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis. A comparison between electrocardiography and echocardiography].
    Sonne HS, Mølgaard H, Sørensen KE, Kristensen BO.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Oct 10; 156(41):6032-5. PubMed ID: 7992445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Absence of left ventricular hypertrophy in severe isolated aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular systolic function.
    Barasch E, Kahn J, Petillo F, Pollack S, Rhee PD, Reichek N.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jan 10; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24779322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Cawley PJ, Hamilton-Craig C, Owens DS, Krieger EV, Strugnell WE, Mitsumori L, D'Jang CL, Schwaegler RG, Nguyen KQ, Nguyen B, Maki JH, Otto CM.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan 01; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.