These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
293 related items for PubMed ID: 26208498
1. Multicenter prospective evaluation of a new articulating 5-mm endoscopic linear stapler. Kuthe A, Haemmerle A, Ludwig K, Falck S, Hiller W, Mainik F, Freys S, Dubovoy L, Jaehne J, Oldhafer K. Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1883-93. PubMed ID: 26208498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Totally intracorporeal delta-shaped B-I anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the Tri-Staple™ reloads on the manual Ultra handle: a prospective cohort study with historical controls. Man-I M, Suda K, Kikuchi K, Tanaka T, Furuta S, Nakauchi M, Ishikawa K, Ishida Y, Uyama I. Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3304-12. PubMed ID: 25732753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a Powered Stapler System with Gripping Surface Technology on Surgical Interventions Required During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Fegelman E, Knippenberg S, Schwiers M, Stefanidis D, Gersin KS, Scott JD, Fernandez AZ. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 May; 27(5):489-494. PubMed ID: 27991838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of 5-mm Laparoscopic Stapler to Perform Open Small Bowel Anastomosis in a Neonatal Animal Model. Glenn IC, Bruns NE, Ponsky TA. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Oct; 26(10):840-844. PubMed ID: 27462959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Staple line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy with a new type of reinforced stapler. El Moussaoui I, Limbga A, Mehdi A. Minerva Chir; 2018 Apr; 73(2):127-132. PubMed ID: 29397639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo evaluation of a modified linear stapling device designed to facilitate accurate pathologic examination of the surgical margin. Tsujimoto H, Tsuda H, Hiraki S, Nomura S, Ito N, Kanematsu K, Horiguchi H, Aosasa S, Yamamoto J, Hase K. Gastric Cancer; 2016 Apr; 19(2):666-669. PubMed ID: 26199024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. RESULTS OF MECHANIC VERSUS MOTORIZED STAPLER USED IN GASTRIC SURGERY: PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Braghetto I, Czwiklitzer G, Korn O, Brante P, Burgos A. Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2024 Apr; 37():e1818. PubMed ID: 39230118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design. Contini E, Godek ML, Whiffen JM, Bronson DG. Innovations (Phila); 2013 Apr; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Duodenal Atresia Repair Using a Miniature Stapler Compared to Laparoscopic Hand-Sewn and Open Technique. Holler AS, Muensterer OJ, Martynov I, Gianicolo EA, Lacher M, Zimmermann P. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Oct; 29(10):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31150305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Salyer C, Spuzzillo A, Wakefield D, Gomaa D, Thompson J, Goodman M. Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):4016-4021. PubMed ID: 32749610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laparoscopic linear staplers in clinical practice. Simper SC, Erzinger JM, Smith SC. Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2007 Jul; 3(4):446-50; discussion 450-1. PubMed ID: 17400029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement reduces staple site bleeding during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Welbourne S, Sabio A, Wilson SE. Arch Surg; 2005 Aug; 140(8):773-8. PubMed ID: 16103288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Serosal Laceration During Firing of Powered Linear Stapler Is a Predictor of Staple Malformation. Matsuzawa F, Homma S, Yoshida T, Konishi Y, Shibasaki S, Ishikawa T, Kawamura H, Takahashi N, Iijima H, Taketomi A. Surg Innov; 2017 Dec; 24(6):590-597. PubMed ID: 28962536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel narrow profile articulating powered vascular stapler provides superior access and haemostasis equivalent to conventional devices†. Ng CS, Pickens A, Siegel JM, Clymer JW, Cummings JF. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i73-8. PubMed ID: 26464450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and Feasibility of a Lower-Cost Stapler in Bariatric Surgery. Roberts KE, Renee Hilton L, Friedman DT, Frieder JS, Zhang X, Duffy AJ. Obes Surg; 2019 Feb; 29(2):401-405. PubMed ID: 30411224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. High incidence of technical errors involving the EEA circular stapler: a single institution experience. Offodile AC, Feingold DL, Nasar A, Whelan RL, Arnell TD. J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Mar; 210(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 20193897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not? Giaccaglia V, Antonelli MS, Addario Chieco P, Cocorullo G, Cavallini M, Gulotta G. J Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 197(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 25918006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of staple height on postoperative complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery using linear staplers. Lundvall E, Ottosson J, Stenberg E. Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Mar; 15(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 30738736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized comparison of linear staplers during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Champion JK, Williams MD. Obes Surg; 2003 Dec; 13(6):855-9; discussion 860. PubMed ID: 14738669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Tri-Staple Technology and Slow Firing on Secure Stapling Using an Endoscopic Linear Stapler. Hasegawa S, Nakayama S, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y. Dig Surg; 2015 Dec; 32(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 26228297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]