These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

731 related items for PubMed ID: 26210864

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Marini M, Da Pozzo S, Accardo A, Canziani T.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS, Rosentreter A, Gaki S, Lappas A, Dietlein TS.
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
    Kim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Jimenez-Santos M, Saenz-Frances F, Matilla-Rodero M, Mendez-Hernandez C, Herrero-Vanrell R, Garcia-Feijoo J.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patients.
    Tan S, Yu M, Baig N, Hansapinyo L, Tham CC.
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb 06; 7():42067. PubMed ID: 28165028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K, Dervan E, Falzon K, O'Brien C.
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb 06; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients].
    Valero B, Fénolland JR, Rosenberg R, Sendon D, Mesnard C, Sigaux M, Giraud JM, Renard JP.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec 06; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements.
    Esporcatte BL, Lopes FS, Fonseca Netto C, Rebouças-Santos V, Dias DT, Marujo FI, Rolim-de-Moura C.
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015 Dec 06; 78(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 26677038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.