These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

307 related items for PubMed ID: 26211939

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
    Dicu D, Pop F, Ionescu D, Dicu T.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW, Lu YW, Teller T, Sekhon HK, Wu BU.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
    Stanley AJ, Dalton HR, Blatchford O, Ashley D, Mowat C, Cahill A, Gaya DR, Thompson E, Warshow U, Hare N, Groome M, Benson G, Murray W.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Aug; 34(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21707681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA, Dalton H, Blatchford O, Ashley D, Mowat C, Gaya DR, Cahill A, Warshow U, Hare N, Groome M, Forrest EH, Morris J, Stanley AJ.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
    Budimir I, Stojsavljević S, Baršić N, Bišćanin A, Mirošević G, Bohnec S, Kirigin LS, Pavić T, Ljubičić N.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov 07; 23(41):7450-7458. PubMed ID: 29151699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.