These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

272 related items for PubMed ID: 26213265

  • 1. Accuracy of 3 different impression techniques for internal connection angulated implants.
    Tsagkalidis G, Tortopidis D, Mpikos P, Kaisarlis G, Koidis P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 26213265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K, Zandparsa R, Finkelman M, Hirayama H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants.
    Mpikos P, Kafantaris N, Tortopidis D, Galanis C, Kaisarlis G, Koidis P.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Aug; 27(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 23189292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study.
    Khan SA, Singh S, Neyaz N, Jaiswal MM, Tanwar AS, Singh A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb 01; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr 01; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG, Mazaro JV, Vedovatto E, Assunção WG, dos Santos PH.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb 01; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P, Lal K, White GS, Weber HP, Gallucci GO.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Feb 01; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An in vitro study.
    Kaur T, Singla S, Kumar L.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023 Feb 01; 23(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36588371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Feb 01; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Feb 01; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O, Ozcelik TB, Yagiz A.
    J Dent; 2014 Dec 01; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques.
    Al Quran FA, Rashdan BA, Zomar AA, Weiner S.
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Feb 01; 43(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 22257873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of complete-arch implant impression made with occlusal registration material.
    Papazoglou E, Wee AG, Carr AB, Urban I, Margaritis V.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan 01; 123(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 31079882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY, Cader FN, Abduo J, Palamara J.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb 01; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr 01; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr 01; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS, Jain S, Kumar S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug 01; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels.
    Martínez-Rus F, García C, Santamaría A, Özcan M, Pradíes G.
    Implant Dent; 2013 Jun 01; 22(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 23615660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Jun 01; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.