These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 26214093

  • 1. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Peng N, Zou X, Li L.
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK, de Vliegher SP, Govaere JL, de Schauwer C, de Kruif A, van Soom A.
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J, Zeng Y, Song C, Mo ML, Yin B, Lin Q, Huang J.
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Influence of different filling method-related sperm counting chambers and structural factors of disposable chambers on sperm motility].
    Zheng LJ, Zhang JW, Peng YY, Wang HL, Zhou XM, Wang W.
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Nov; 27(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 37422871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of commercially available chamber slides for computer-aided analysis of human sperm.
    Dardmeh F, Heidari M, Alipour H.
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Apr; 67(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33375858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA, Lu JC, Lu NQ, Shao Y, Huang YF.
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of sperm counting accuracy on computer-assisted sperm analysis with GoldCyto® slides and glass slides.
    Akal E.
    Front Vet Sci; 2023 Mar; 10():1283128. PubMed ID: 37876632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Method agreement between three different chambers for comparative boar semen computer-assisted sperm analysis.
    Basioura A, Tsousis G, Boscos C, Lymberopoulos A, Tsakmakidis I.
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Oct; 54 Suppl 4():41-45. PubMed ID: 31232479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Which fields under a coverslip should one assess to estimate sperm motility?
    Nöthling JO, dos Santos IP.
    Theriogenology; 2012 May; 77(8):1686-97. PubMed ID: 22341712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of the chamber on kinetic results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
    Gloria A, Carluccio A, Contri A, Wegher L, Valorz C, Robbe D.
    Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 23996954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Combined effect of type and capture area of counting chamber and diluent on Holstein bull sperm kinematics.
    Valverde A, Areán H, Fernández A, Bompart D, García-Molina A, López-Viana J, Soler C.
    Andrologia; 2019 May; 51(4):e13223. PubMed ID: 30588646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of chamber characteristics, loading and analysis time on motility and kinetic variables analysed with the CASA-mot system in goat sperm.
    Del Gallego R, Sadeghi S, Blasco E, Soler C, Yániz JL, Silvestre MA.
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2017 Feb; 177():97-104. PubMed ID: 28063626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy Evaluation of The Depth of Six Kinds of Sperm Counting Chambers for both Manual and Computer-Aided Semen Analyses.
    Lu JC, Yue RQ, Feng RX, Kong LZ, Xu YC.
    Int J Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 9(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 26985341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Method agreement between three different chambers for comparative bull semen computer assisted sperm motility analysis.
    Basioura A, Tsousis G, Boscos C, Lymberopoulos A, Tsakmakidis I.
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2020 Sep; 23(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 33006852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE, Boone WR, Blackhurst DW.
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Quality evaluation of three different sperm counting chambers].
    Lu J, Lü N, Huang Y, Li PS, Fisch H.
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Oct; 10(10):755-7, 760. PubMed ID: 15562789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.