These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

252 related items for PubMed ID: 26219160

  • 1. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form.
    Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jun; 98(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 26219160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle.
    Angthong C.
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability.
    Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu B, Celik D.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jan; 58(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 30448187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders.
    Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Taghizadeh F, Feizi A, Karimi A, Parnianpour M.
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2010 Jun; 18(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 20338253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.
    Lertwanich P, Praphruetkit T, Keyurapan E, Lamsam C, Kulthanan T.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Aug; 91(8):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18788694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire.
    Moreira TS, Magalhães Lde C, Silva RD, Martin RL, Resende MA.
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 38(25):2479-90. PubMed ID: 26878102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure.
    Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, Nagano Y, Shinozuka N, Sunagawa N, Fukubayashi T.
    J Athl Train; 2015 Jan; 50(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25310247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
    Çelik D, Malkoç M, Martin R.
    Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1469-76. PubMed ID: 27136921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure.
    Weel H, Zwiers R, Azim D, Sierevelt IN, Haverkamp D, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25536950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
    Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Nov; 26(11):968-83. PubMed ID: 16309613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability.
    Nauck T, Lohrer H.
    Br J Sports Med; 2011 Aug; 45(10):785-90. PubMed ID: 19955163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM.
    Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Feb 08; 12():40. PubMed ID: 21303520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.
    Analay Akbaba Y, Celik D, Ogut RT.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Feb 08; 55(6):1139-1142. PubMed ID: 27614824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).
    Turhan E, Demirel M, Daylak A, Huri G, Doral MN, Çelik D.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Jan 08; 51(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 27956082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Greek Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Quick Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Questionnaire.
    Koumantakis GA, Galazoulas A, Stefanakis M, Paraskevopoulos E, Gioftsos G, Papandreou M.
    J Sport Rehabil; 2023 Nov 01; 32(8):855-862. PubMed ID: 37591505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Rasch Analysis of Reliability and Validity of Scores From the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
    Matheny LM, Clanton TO.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2020 Feb 01; 41(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 31665926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus.
    Martin RL, Hutt DM, Wukich DK.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Apr 01; 30(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 19356352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.