These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

529 related items for PubMed ID: 26221927

  • 1. Effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement lining and composite layering technique on the adhesive interface of lateral wall.
    Azevedo LM, Casas-Apayco LC, Villavicencio Espinoza CA, Wang L, Navarro MF, Atta MT.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 26221927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling.
    Sampaio PC, de Almeida Júnior AA, Francisconi LF, Casas-Apayco LC, Pereira JC, Wang L, Atta MT.
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y, Ma X, Fan M, Zhu S.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Internal adaptation of resin composite restorations with different thicknesses of glass ionomer cement lining.
    Chailert O, Banomyong D, Vongphan N, Ekworapoj P, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 May; 9(2):e12308. PubMed ID: 29226608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microtensile bond strength of tooth-colored materials to primary tooth dentin.
    Suwatviroj P, Messer LB, Palamara JE.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 May; 26(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15080362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin.
    de Menezes MJ, Arrais CA, Giannini M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16911888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Mar; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Mar; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.
    Korkmaz Y, Gurgan S, Firat E, Nathanson D.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Mar; 35(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 20166411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
    Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 15134946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S, de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesive.
    Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Gomes G.
    Am J Dent; 2011 Aug; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 22016915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Aug; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of bond strength and internal adaptation between the dental cavity and adhesives applied in one and two layers.
    Soares CG, Carracho HG, Braun AP, Borges GA, Hirakata LM, Spohr AM.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Aug; 35(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 20166413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nör JE.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 Aug; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.