These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

209 related items for PubMed ID: 26224221

  • 1. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Takwoingi Y, Thornton JG, Jones NW.
    BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 26224221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mazzone E, Dall'Asta A, Kiener AJO, Carpano MG, Suprani A, Ghi T, Frusca T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Moraitis AA, Shreeve N, Sovio U, Brocklehurst P, Heazell AEP, Thornton JG, Robson SC, Papageorghiou A, Smith GC.
    PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003190. PubMed ID: 33048935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review.
    Coomarasamy A, Connock M, Thornton J, Khan KS.
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1461-6. PubMed ID: 16225563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, Kang X, Carlin A, Benjou Etchoua S, Resta S, Dütemeyer V, Abi-Khalil F, Mazzone E, Bevilacqua E, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates using MR imaging: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound.
    Carlin A, Kadji C, De Angelis R, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1673-1681. PubMed ID: 29212395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Combined analysis with amniotic fluid index and estimated fetal weight for prediction of severe macrosomia at birth.
    Hackmon R, Bornstein E, Ferber A, Horani J, O'Reilly Green CP, Divon MY.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):333.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17403410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prediction of large-for-gestational age at 36 weeks' gestation: two-dimensional ultrasound vs three-dimensional ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging.
    Mazzone E, Kadji C, Cannie MM, Badr DA, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 37725758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.