These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 26224610

  • 1. The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, Hachisuka S, Ochi M.
    Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26224610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Do post-operative changes of neck-shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty?
    Müller M, Abdel MP, Wassilew GI, Duda G, Perka C.
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Dec; 97-B(12):1615-22. PubMed ID: 26637674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Excessive femoral offset does not affect the range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Hayashi S, Nishiyama T, Fujishiro T, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M.
    Int Orthop; 2013 Jul; 37(7):1233-7. PubMed ID: 23553118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.
    Kurtz WB, Ecker TM, Reichmann WM, Murphy SB.
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):624-34.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19559561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Low femoral antetorsion as a risk factor for bony impingement after bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
    Shoji T, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, Hachisuka S, Ochi M.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Jul 07; 10():105. PubMed ID: 26149008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor.
    Shoji T, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, Hachisuka S, Ochi M.
    Int Orthop; 2015 Jan 07; 39(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 25086820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Mori R, Hamanishi M, Ochi M.
    Int Orthop; 2013 Oct 07; 37(10):1897-903. PubMed ID: 23860789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Taga T, Hasegawa K, Inoue D, Yamamoto T, Takagi T, Yoshitani J, Ueno T, Tsuchiya H.
    Int Orthop; 2018 May 07; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of hip center position, anterior inferior iliac spine morphology, and ball head diameter on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Tabata T, Kaku N, Tagomori H, Tsumura H.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb 07; 105(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 30509621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Factors affecting the potential for posterior bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, Murakami H, Mifuji K, Sawa M, Yasunaga Y, Adachi N, Ochi M.
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Sep 07; 99-B(9):1140-1146. PubMed ID: 28860392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Some Offset Restoration Options Can Paradoxically Lead to Decreased Range of Motion in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 3-Dimensional Computer Simulation Study.
    Pour AE, Donnelley CA, Tung WS, Tommasini SM, Wiznia D.
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb 07; 39(2):514-519.e3. PubMed ID: 37625464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
    Widmer KH.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug 07; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.
    Debbi EM, Quevedo González FJ, Jerabek SA, Wright TM, Vigdorchik JM.
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul 07; 37(7S):S678-S684. PubMed ID: 35271980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.
    Woerner M, Weber M, Sendtner E, Springorum R, Worlicek M, Craiovan B, Grifka J, Renkawitz T.
    Int Orthop; 2017 Feb 07; 41(2):277-282. PubMed ID: 27150487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A biomechanical comparison of the thrust plate prosthesis and a stemmed prosthesis.
    Karatosun V, Unver B, Gultekin A, Gunal I.
    Hip Int; 2011 Feb 07; 21(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 21960448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.
    Wells J, Nepple JJ, Crook K, Ross JR, Bedi A, Schoenecker P, Clohisy JC.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr 07; 475(4):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 27752989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of cup medialization and lateralization on hip range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, Kenji M, Sawa M, Yasunaga Y, Adachi N.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2018 Aug 07; 57():121-128. PubMed ID: 29986274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Increased range of motion to impingement with large head total hip arthroplasty: point of diminishing returns.
    Klingenstein GG, Yeager AM, Lipman JD, Westrich GH.
    Hip Int; 2012 Aug 07; 22(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 22773504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.