These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

513 related items for PubMed ID: 26233047

  • 1. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E, Nelson P, Souza P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Mehraei G, Shamma S, Gallun FJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S, Mauermann M, Ewert SD.
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC, Reed CM, Desloge JG, Swaminathan J, Braida LD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C, Warzybok A, Ernst SM.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Mehraei G, Gallun FJ, Leek MR, Bernstein JG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul 30; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
    Arlinger S, Dryselius H.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jul 30; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Bost TJM, Versfeld NJ, Goverts ST.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jul 30; 40(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 31242137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ, Nelson PB, Schlauch RS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct 30; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.
    Miller CW, Bernstein JGW, Zhang X, Wu YH, Bentler RA, Tremblay K.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec 10; 61(12):3113-3126. PubMed ID: 30515519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
    van Esch TE, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul 10; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Kirby BJ, Spratford M, Klein KE, McCreery RW.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jul 10; 40(3):645-650. PubMed ID: 30130295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar 10; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.