These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

627 related items for PubMed ID: 26252837

  • 1. A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude in the Parallel, Full, and Front Squat Variations in Resistance-Trained Females.
    Contreras B, Vigotsky AD, Schoenfeld BJ, Beardsley C, Cronin J.
    J Appl Biomech; 2016 Feb; 32(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 26252837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude for the Barbell, Band, and American Hip Thrust Variations.
    Contreras B, Vigotsky AD, Schoenfeld BJ, Beardsley C, Cronin J.
    J Appl Biomech; 2016 Jun; 32(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 26695353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyographic Activity in the Back Squat and Barbell Hip Thrust Exercises.
    Contreras B, Vigotsky AD, Schoenfeld BJ, Beardsley C, Cronin J.
    J Appl Biomech; 2015 Dec; 31(6):452-8. PubMed ID: 26214739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electromyographic activity in the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis and rectus femoris during the Monopodal Squat, Forward Lunge and Lateral Step-Up exercises.
    Muyor JM, Martín-Fuentes I, Rodríguez-Ridao D, Antequera-Vique JA.
    PLoS One; 2020 Dec; 15(4):e0230841. PubMed ID: 32236133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Muscle Activation Differs Between Partial and Full Back Squat Exercise With External Load Equated.
    da Silva JJ, Schoenfeld BJ, Marchetti PN, Pecoraro SL, Greve JMD, Marchetti PH.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jun; 31(6):1688-1693. PubMed ID: 28538321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Kinematic and EMG activities during front and back squat variations in maximum loads.
    Yavuz HU, Erdağ D, Amca AM, Aritan S.
    J Sports Sci; 2015 Jun; 33(10):1058-66. PubMed ID: 25630691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of muscle activation and kinematics during free-weight back squats with different loads.
    van den Tillaar R, Andersen V, Saeterbakken AH.
    PLoS One; 2019 Jun; 14(5):e0217044. PubMed ID: 31095625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of squat depth on multiarticular muscle activation in collegiate cross-country runners.
    Gorsuch J, Long J, Miller K, Primeau K, Rutledge S, Sossong A, Durocher JJ.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Sep; 27(9):2619-25. PubMed ID: 23254544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of stance width on the electromyographical activity of eight superficial thigh muscles during back squat with different bar loads.
    Paoli A, Marcolin G, Petrone N.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):246-50. PubMed ID: 19130646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Muscle Activation in Unilateral Barbell Exercises: Implications for Strength Training and Rehabilitation.
    Mausehund L, Skard AE, Krosshaug T.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():S85-S94. PubMed ID: 29870422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of external load on muscle activation during the barbell back squat.
    Martinez SC, Coons JM, Mehls KD.
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Jun; 23(6):975-982. PubMed ID: 35603722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Muscle Activation Patterns of Lower-Body Musculature Among 3 Traditional Lower-Body Exercises in Trained Women.
    Korak JA, Paquette MR, Fuller DK, Caputo JL, Coons JM.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Oct; 32(10):2770-2775. PubMed ID: 29465608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A biomechanical comparison of back and front squats in healthy trained individuals.
    Gullett JC, Tillman MD, Gutierrez GM, Chow JW.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):284-92. PubMed ID: 19002072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.
    Aspe RR, Swinton PA.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2827-36. PubMed ID: 24662228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of free weight squat to Smith machine squat using electromyography.
    Schwanbeck S, Chilibeck PD, Binsted G.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Dec; 23(9):2588-91. PubMed ID: 19855308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electromyographic Comparison of Five Lower-Limb Muscles between Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises among Trained Men.
    Stien N, Saeterbakken AH, Andersen V.
    J Sports Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 20(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 33707987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Activation of Gluteal, Thigh, and Lower Back Muscles in Different Squat Variations Performed by Competitive Bodybuilders: Implications for Resistance Training.
    Coratella G, Tornatore G, Caccavale F, Longo S, Esposito F, Cè E.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan 18; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33477561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Squat Techniques.
    Slater LV, Hart JM.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Mar 18; 31(3):667-676. PubMed ID: 26808843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Similar electromyographic activities of lower limbs between squatting on a reebok core board and ground.
    Li Y, Cao C, Chen X.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 May 18; 27(5):1349-53. PubMed ID: 22836603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Net joint moments and muscle activation in barbell squats without and with restricted anterior leg rotation.
    Chiu LZ, vonGaza GL, Jean LM.
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Jan 18; 35(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26930422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.