These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
223 related items for PubMed ID: 26267907
1. Performance of Dutch children on the Bayley III: a comparison study of US and Dutch norms. Steenis LJ, Verhoeven M, Hessen DJ, van Baar AL. PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0132871. PubMed ID: 26267907 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Norms on the Outcome of Children Born Very-Preterm when Using the Bayley-III: Differences between US and German Norms. Fuiko R, Oberleitner-Leeb C, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Berger A, Brandstetter S, Giordano V. Neonatology; 2019; 116(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 30889586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison Study of the Tehran Norms to the Reference Norms on Children Performance of the Bayley III. Soleimani F, Azari N, Kraskian A, Karimi H, Sajedi F, Vameghi R, Shahshahani S, Mehdipour Shahrivar N, Shahrokhi A, Teymouri R, Gharib M, Noroozi M. Iran J Child Neurol; 2022; 16(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 35497097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Children born extremely preterm show significant lower cognitive, language and motor function levels compared with children born at term, as measured by the Bayley-III at 2.5 years. Månsson J, Stjernqvist K. Acta Paediatr; 2014 May; 103(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 24494838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Performance of Iranian Azeri-Speaking Children Based on Iran and Reference Bayley III Norms. Hasani Khiabani N, Barzegar M, Raeisi S, Jalalian Chaleshtori M, Heidarabadi S, Bahari Gharehgoz A. Iran J Child Neurol; 2022 May; 16(2):39-52. PubMed ID: 35497111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III). Chinta S, Walker K, Halliday R, Loughran-Fowlds A, Badawi N. Arch Dis Child; 2014 Jul; 99(7):621-4. PubMed ID: 24504506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Neurodevelopmental outcome of Italian preterm children at 1year of corrected age by Bayley-III scales: An assessment using local norms. Gasparini C, Caravale B, Rea M, Coletti MF, Tonchei V, Bucci S, Dotta A, De Curtis M, Gentile S, Ferri R. Early Hum Dev; 2017 Oct; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 28697405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and cross-cultural differences of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition in typically developing infants. Hoskens J, Klingels K, Smits-Engelsman B. Early Hum Dev; 2018 Oct; 125():17-25. PubMed ID: 30172781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of US norms for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III in Malawian children. Cromwell EA, Dube Q, Cole SR, Chirambo C, Dow AE, Heyderman RS, Van Rie A. Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2014 Mar; 18(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 24423629 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the performance of normal middle social class Egyptian infants and toddlers with the reference norms of the Bayley Scales -third edition (Bayley III): A pilot study. Salah El-Din EM, Monir ZM, Shehata MA, Abouelnaga MW, Abushady MM, Youssef MM, Megahed HS, Salem SME, Metwally AM. PLoS One; 2021 Mar; 16(12):e0260138. PubMed ID: 34855785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The interrelationships between motor, cognitive, and language development in children with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities. Houwen S, Visser L, van der Putten A, Vlaskamp C. Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Mar; 53-54():19-31. PubMed ID: 26851384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Parental and professional assessment of early child development: the ASQ-3 and the Bayley-III-NL. Steenis LJ, Verhoeven M, Hessen DJ, van Baar AL. Early Hum Dev; 2015 Mar; 91(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 25703316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cultural adaptation of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition for use in Kenyan children aged 18-36 months: A psychometric study. McHenry MS, Oyungu E, Yang Z, Hines AC, Ombitsa AR, Vreeman RC, Abubakar A, Monahan PO. Res Dev Disabil; 2021 Mar; 110():103837. PubMed ID: 33453695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2. Connolly BH, McClune NO, Gatlin R. Pediatr Phys Ther; 2012 Mar; 24(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 22965209 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying Dutch and US versions of the BSID-II in Dutch children born preterm leads to different outcomes. Westera JJ, Houtzager BA, Overdiek B, van Wassenaer AG. Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Jun; 50(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 18459980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptability and Reliability of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III Among Children in Bhaktapur, Nepal. Ranjitkar S, Kvestad I, Strand TA, Ulak M, Shrestha M, Chandyo RK, Shrestha L, Hysing M. Front Psychol; 2018 Jun; 9():1265. PubMed ID: 30087639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Concurrent validity of the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Peyton C, Msall ME, Wroblewski K, Rogers EE, Kohn M, Glass HC. Dev Med Child Neurol; 2021 Mar; 63(3):349-354. PubMed ID: 33206384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]