These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

580 related items for PubMed ID: 26283524

  • 21. Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation.
    Hulst T, John L, Küper M, van der Geest JN, Göricke SL, Donchin O, Timmann D.
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Aug 01; 118(2):732-748. PubMed ID: 28469001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans.
    Dutta A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Feb 10; 11():13. PubMed ID: 24507410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Investigation of Neuromodulatory Effect of Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Shoaib Z, Chang WK, Lee J, Lee SH, Phillips V Z, Lee SH, Paik NJ, Hwang HJ, Kim WS.
    Cerebellum; 2024 Feb 10; 23(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 36633829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Polarity independent effects of cerebellar tDCS on short term ankle visuomotor learning.
    Shah B, Nguyen TT, Madhavan S.
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Nov 10; 6(6):966-8. PubMed ID: 23711765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Propriospinal cutaneous-induced EMG suppression is unaltered by anodal tDCS of healthy motor cortex.
    McCambridge AB, Stinear JW, Peek S, Byblow WD.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Sep 10; 128(9):1608-1616. PubMed ID: 28715712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Pulse Duration as Well as Current Direction Determines the Specificity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex during Contraction.
    Hannah R, Rothwell JC.
    Brain Stimul; 2017 Sep 10; 10(1):106-115. PubMed ID: 28029595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Does Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Induce Cerebellum Plasticity? Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Electrophysiological Approach.
    Naro A, Leo A, Russo M, Cannavò A, Milardi D, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS.
    Brain Stimul; 2016 Sep 10; 9(3):388-395. PubMed ID: 26946958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The effects of imaginary voluntary muscle contraction and relaxation on cerebellar brain inhibition.
    Tanaka H, Matsugi A, Okada Y.
    Neurosci Res; 2018 Aug 10; 133():15-20. PubMed ID: 29154805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Utilising TMS-EEG to Assess the Response to Cerebellar-Brain Inhibition.
    Sasaki R, Hand BJ, Liao WY, Rogasch NC, Fernandez L, Semmler JG, Opie GM.
    Cerebellum; 2023 Aug 10; 22(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 35661100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and patterned electrical stimulation on spinal inhibitory interneurons and motor function in patients with spinal cord injury.
    Yamaguchi T, Fujiwara T, Tsai YA, Tang SC, Kawakami M, Mizuno K, Kodama M, Masakado Y, Liu M.
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun 10; 234(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26790423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.