These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
619 related items for PubMed ID: 26285740
1. Importance of re-calibration time on pulse contour analysis agreement with thermodilution measurements of cardiac output: a retrospective analysis of intensive care unit patients. Scully CG, Gomatam S, Forrest S, Strauss DG. J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):577-86. PubMed ID: 26285740 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution. Smetkin AA, Hussain A, Fot EV, Zakharov VI, Izotova NN, Yudina AS, Dityateva ZA, Gromova YV, Kuzkov VV, Bjertnæs LJ, Kirov MY. J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Greiwe G, Peters V, Hapfelmeier A, Romagnoli S, Kubik M, Saugel B. J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):643-648. PubMed ID: 31456071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre. Cho YJ, Koo CH, Kim TK, Hong DM, Jeon Y. J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):771-782. PubMed ID: 26429135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of the accuracy of pulse-contour cardiac index and suggestion of a calibration-index: a prospective evaluation and validation study. Huber W, Koenig J, Mair S, Schuster T, Saugel B, Eyer F, Phillip V, Schultheiss C, Thies P, Mayr U, Einwächter H, Treiber M, Hoellthaler J, Schmid RM. BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 Dec; 15():45. PubMed ID: 25861243 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients. Bendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N, Simon TP, Geisen M, Hoeft A, Siegenthaler N, Hofer CK. Br J Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 111(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 23625132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Less invasive determination of cardiac output from the arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour. de Vaal JB, de Wilde RB, van den Berg PC, Schreuder JJ, Jansen JR. Br J Anaesth; 2005 Sep; 95(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 16006488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Cardiac Output by Nine Different Pulse Contour Algorithms in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Comparison with Transpulmonary Thermodilution. Broch O, Bein B, Gruenewald M, Masing S, Huenges K, Haneya A, Steinfath M, Renner J. Biomed Res Int; 2016 Sep; 2016():3468015. PubMed ID: 28116294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between an uncalibrated pulse contour method and thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation in septic patients. Franchi F, Silvestri R, Cubattoli L, Taccone FS, Donadello K, Romano SM, Giomarelli P, McBride WT, Scolletta S. Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 21665901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous and minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring by long time interval analysis of a radial arterial pressure waveform: assessment using a large, public intensive care unit patient database. Zhang G, Mukkamala R. Br J Anaesth; 2012 Sep; 109(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 22499767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]