These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
240 related items for PubMed ID: 26302496
1. A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes. Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, Bethea E, Rupawala A, Kheder J, Nompleggi D, Liang P, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 50(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 26302496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding. Hyett BH, Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, Kumar NL, Brozovic S, Claggett BL, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems. Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R. Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding. Budimir I, Gradišer M, Nikolić M, Baršić N, Ljubičić N, Kralj D, Budimir I. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium. BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin. Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA. Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality. Martínez-Cara JG, Jiménez-Rosales R, Úbeda-Muñoz M, de Hierro ML, de Teresa J, Redondo-Cerezo E. United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun 01; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru]. Espinoza-Ríos J, Aguilar Sánchez V, Bravo Paredes EA, Pinto Valdivia J, Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J. Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016 Jun 01; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC. BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study. Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar. Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr 26; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Kalkan Ç, Soykan I, Karakaya F, Tüzün A, Gençtürk ZB. Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr 26; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H. Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ. Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct 15; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcomes of Small Bowel Bleeding. Shual S, Zhifang Z, Yuming W, Hong J, Chao S, Kui J, Bangmao W. Turk J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jun 15; 32(6):493-499. PubMed ID: 34405815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [AIMS65 score validation for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the National Hospital Cayetano Heredia]. Aguilar Sánchez V, Bravo Paredes EA, Pinto Valdivia JL, Valenzuela Granados V, Espinoza-Rios JL. Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2015 Jun 15; 35(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 26802886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study. Prasitvarakul K, Attanath N, Chang A. World J Surg; 2024 Feb 15; 48(2):474-483. PubMed ID: 38686770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding. Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P. Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 15; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]