These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

214 related items for PubMed ID: 26304356

  • 1. Development of qualitative and quantitative PCR analysis for meat adulteration from RNA samples.
    Cheng JH, Chou HT, Lee MS, Sheu SC.
    Food Chem; 2016 Feb 01; 192():336-42. PubMed ID: 26304356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Direct-multiplex PCR assay for meat species identification in food products.
    Kitpipit T, Sittichan K, Thanakiatkrai P.
    Food Chem; 2014 Nov 15; 163():77-82. PubMed ID: 24912698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Establishment and Validation of a Multiplex PCR Detection System for the Identification of Six Common Edible Meat Components.
    Jiang ZW, Xia RC, Tao RY, Li CT.
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jun 25; 40(3):254-260. PubMed ID: 39166306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Multiplex PCR and 12S rRNA gene sequencing for detection of meat adulteration: A case study in the Egyptian markets.
    Galal-Khallaf A.
    Gene; 2021 Jan 05; 764():145062. PubMed ID: 32860900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of quantitative methods based on SYBR Green real-time qPCR to estimate pork meat adulteration in processed beef products.
    Kang TS, Tanaka T.
    Food Chem; 2018 Dec 15; 269():549-558. PubMed ID: 30100472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Detection and quantification of beef and pork materials in meat products by duplex droplet digital PCR.
    Cai Y, He Y, Lv R, Chen H, Wang Q, Pan L.
    PLoS One; 2017 Dec 15; 12(8):e0181949. PubMed ID: 28771608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Duplex PCR-ELONA for the detection of pork adulteration in meat products.
    Skouridou V, Tomaso H, Rau J, Bashammakh AS, El-Shahawi MS, Alyoubi AO, O'Sullivan CK.
    Food Chem; 2019 Jul 30; 287():354-362. PubMed ID: 30857710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Detection of pork adulteration in processed meat by species-specific PCR-QIAxcel procedure based on D-loop and cytb genes.
    Barakat H, El-Garhy HA, Moustafa MM.
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Dec 30; 98(23):9805-16. PubMed ID: 25324129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.