These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
319 related items for PubMed ID: 26309497
21. An in vivo study to assess and compare the angular, linear, and depth deviation as well as the difference in bone density of implants placed using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated three-dimensional guides versus the implants placed using bone pen kit in maxillary and mandibular ridges. Aggarwal S, Aggarwal S, Goswami R, Mowar A, Tomar N, Saxena D. J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(3):266-276. PubMed ID: 37929366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Pişkin B, Özdemir T. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 22235792 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Cassetta M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Stefanelli LV. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014 Dec; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Depth distortion and angular deviation of a fully guided tooth-supported static surgical guide in a partially edentulous patient: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Floriani F, Jurado CA, Cabrera AJ, Duarte W, Porto TS, Afrashtehfar KI. J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep; 33(S1):10-24. PubMed ID: 38992883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of a guided implant system with milled surgical templates. Li-Rodríguez JK, Díaz-Durany M, Romeo-Rubio M, Paz Salido M, Pradíes G. J Oral Sci; 2022 Apr 01; 64(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 35321962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models. Bae MJ, Kim JY, Park JT, Cha JY, Kim HJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun 01; 143(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 23726340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of the novel digital non-cross-arch surgical guides with integration of tooth undercut retention and screw-bone support for implant placement in mandibular free-end. Wu Q, Lou Y, Sun J, Xie C, Wu J, Yu H. BMC Oral Health; 2024 May 11; 24(1):550. PubMed ID: 38734597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]