These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System. Pierconti F, Martini M, Cenci T, Petrone GL, Ricci R, Sacco E, Bassi PF, Larocca LM. Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system. Egevad L, Mazzucchelli R, Montironi R. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen. Huang CC, Kong MX, Zhou M, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS, Melamed J, Deng FM. Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation. Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Billis A, Cheng L, Clouston D, Evans A, Furusato B, Kench J, Leite K, MacLennan G, Moch H, Pan CC, Rioux-Leclercq N, Ro J, Shanks J, Shen S, Tsuzuki T, Varma M, Wheeler T, Yaxley J, Egevad L. Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies. Billis A, Guimaraes MS, Freitas LL, Meirelles L, Magna LA, Ferreira U. J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy. Takeuchi N, Sakamoto S, Nishiyama A, Horikoshi T, Yamada Y, Iizuka J, Maimaiti M, Imamura Y, Kawamura K, Imamoto T, Komiya A, Ikehara Y, Akakura K, Ichikawa T. Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA. Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Takeshima Y, Yamada Y, Teshima T, Fujimura T, Kakutani S, Hakozaki Y, Kimura N, Akiyama Y, Sato Y, Kawai T, Yamada D, Kume H. BMC Cancer; 2021 May 04; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]