These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

356 related items for PubMed ID: 26328677

  • 1. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Mar; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Mar; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Zhang M, Mary Ying YL, Ihlefeld A.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Feb; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A, Litovsky RY.
    PLoS One; 2012 Feb; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B, Dietz M, Hohmann V, Jürgens T.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Dec 30; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ, Yarnell Bonino A, Buss E.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec 30; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Best V, Swaminathan J.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec 30; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
    Buss E, Leibold LJ, Porter HL, Grose JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr 30; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Apr 30; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 30; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
    Arweiler I, Buchholz JM, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan 30; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB, Dau T, Neher T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan 30; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep 30; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Sep 30; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of language, spatial factors, masker type and memory span on speech-in-noise thresholds in sequential bilingual children.
    MacCutcheon D, Pausch F, Fels J, Ljung R.
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Dec 30; 59(6):567-577. PubMed ID: 30137681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.