These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
818 related items for PubMed ID: 26335671
1. Three-Dimensional Correction in Patients With Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Comparison of Consecutive Versus Interval Pedicle Screw Instrumentation. Ketenci IE, Yanik HS, Demiroz S, Ulusoy A, Erdem S. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 26335671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Yilmaz G, Borkhuu B, Dhawale AA, Oto M, Littleton AG, Mason DE, Gabos PG, Shah SA. J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Jan; 32(5):490-9. PubMed ID: 22706465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Cheh G, Sides B. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb 01; 31(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 16449901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Correction of Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does implant density influence the correction? Chen J, Yang C, Ran B, Wang Y, Wang C, Zhu X, Bai Y, Li M. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul 01; 38(15):E946-51. PubMed ID: 23615383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Correction of moderate (<70 degrees) Lenke 1A and 2A curve patterns: comparison of hybrid and all-pedicle screw systems at 2-year follow-up. Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Erickson M, Bridwell KH, Richards BS. J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Jul 01; 32(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 22411330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of radiographic outcomes for the treatment of scoliotic curves greater than 100 degrees: wires versus hooks versus screws. Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim YJ, Watanabe K, Kim YW, Kim YB, Hensley M, Stobbs G. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May 01; 33(10):1084-92. PubMed ID: 18449042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Apical vertebral derotation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: myth or reality? Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G, Maredi E, Vommaro F, Pastorelli F. Eur Spine J; 2013 Feb 01; 22(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 22868455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does higher implant density improve correction? Quan GM, Gibson MJ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar 01; 35(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 20118842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws--which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Cheng I, Kim Y, Gupta MC, Bridwell KH, Hurford RK, Lee SS, Theerajunyaporn T, Lenke LG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep 15; 30(18):2104-12. PubMed ID: 16166903 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: a comparison of two practices. Geck MJ, Rinella A, Hawthorne D, Macagno A, Koester L, Sides B, Bridwell K, Lenke L, Shufflebarger H. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug 15; 34(18):1942-51. PubMed ID: 19680102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-density versus high-density thoracic pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: do more screws lead to a better outcome? Bharucha NJ, Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Kean KE, Trobisch PD. Spine J; 2013 Apr 15; 13(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 22901787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of cross-linking posterior segmental instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2-year follow-up comparative study. Dhawale AA, Shah SA, Yorgova P, Neiss G, Layer DJ, Rogers KJ, Gabos PG, Holmes L. Spine J; 2013 Nov 15; 13(11):1485-92. PubMed ID: 23800823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. All-pedicle-screw versus hybrid hook-screw instrumentation for posterior spinal correction surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a curve flexibility matched-pair study. Yang C, Wei X, Zhang J, Wu D, Zhao Y, Wang C, Zhu X, He S, Li M. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 May 15; 132(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 22252852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does spinal deformity correction of non-dystrophic scoliosis in neurofibromatosis type I with one-stage posterior pedicle screw technique produce outcomes similar to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Lyu Q, Zhou C, Song Y, Liu L, Wang L, Zhou Z. Spine J; 2017 Dec 15; 17(12):1850-1858. PubMed ID: 28645674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of surgical outcomes of lenke type 1 idiopathic scoliosis: vertebral coplanar alignment versus derotation technique. Qiu Y, Zhu F, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu Z, Qian B, Sun X, Ma W. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec 15; 24(8):492-9. PubMed ID: 21336174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical and thoracic sagittal misalignment after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of all pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation. Legarreta CA, Barrios C, Rositto GE, Reviriego JM, Maruenda JI, Escalada MN, Piza-Vallespir G, Burgos J, Hevia E. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul 15; 39(16):1330-7. PubMed ID: 24825159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Liljenqvist U, Lepsien U, Hackenberg L, Niemeyer T, Halm H. Eur Spine J; 2002 Aug 15; 11(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 12193995 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]