These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
166 related items for PubMed ID: 2634718
1. The effects of a hydrocolloid dressing on bacterial growth and the healing process of leg ulcers. Annoni F, Rosina M, Chiurazzi D, Ceva M. Int Angiol; 1989; 8(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 2634718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing. Friedman SJ, Su WP. Arch Dermatol; 1984 Oct; 120(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 6486846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of chronic leg ulcers with a hydrocolloid dressing. Gamborg Nielsen P, Munk Madsen S, Strömberg L. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989 Oct; 152():1-12. PubMed ID: 2618526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers. Seeley J, Jensen JL, Hutcherson J. Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [A comparative study of the hydrocellular dressing Allevyn and the hydrocolloid dressing Duoderm in the local treatment of leg ulcers]. Zuccarelli F. Phlebologie; 1992 Dec; 45(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 1302331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study. Vanscheidt W, Sibbald RG, Eager CA. Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers. Barr JE, Day AL, Weaver VA, Taler GM. Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists. Hermans MH. Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Xakellis GC, Chrischilles EA. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers. Brown-Etris M, Milne C, Orsted H, Gates JL, Netsch D, Punchello M, Couture N, Albert M, Attrell E, Freyberg J. Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study. Ohlsson P, Larsson K, Lindholm C, Möller M. Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers. Colwell JC, Foreman MD, Trotter JP. Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The bacteriology of chronic venous ulcers treated with occlusive hydrocolloid dressings. Gilchrist B, Reed C. Br J Dermatol; 1989 Sep; 121(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 2803959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pressure sore management: efficacy of a moisture reactive occlusive dressing. Yarkony GM, Kramer E, King R, Lukanc C, Carle TV. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Oct; 65(10):597-600. PubMed ID: 6487064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]