These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 26352346

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
    de Souza JF, Diniz MB, Boldieri T, Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
    Diniz MB, Boldieri T, Rodrigues JA, Santos-Pinto L, Lussi A, Cordeiro RC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
    Ribeiro AA, Purger F, Rodrigues JA, Oliveira PR, Lussi A, Monteiro AH, Alves HD, Assis JT, Vasconcellos AB.
    Caries Res; 2015 Apr; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W, Li G, Wennberg R, Näsström K, Shi XQ.
    Swed Dent J; 2013 Apr; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode.
    Cebe F, Aktan AM, Ozsevik AS, Ciftci ME, Surmelioglu HD.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of different caries detectors for approximal caries detection.
    Bozdemir E, Aktan AM, Ozsevik A, Sirin Kararslan E, Ciftci ME, Cebe MA.
    J Dent Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(3):293-298. PubMed ID: 30894987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.