These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
995 related items for PubMed ID: 26358331
1. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps. Park SK, Ko BM, Han JP, Hong SJ, Lee MS. Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):527-32.e1. PubMed ID: 26358331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY. Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 108(10):1593-600. PubMed ID: 24042189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Lv YC, Yao YH, Lei JJ, Tang T. Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Dec; 42(6):757-765. PubMed ID: 37776439 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Jumbo biopsy forceps versus cold snares for removing diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Huh CW, Kim JS, Choi HH, Maeng IS, Jun SY, Kim BW. Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jul; 90(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 30684600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy. Komeda Y, Kashida H, Sakurai T, Tribonias G, Okamoto K, Kono M, Yamada M, Adachi T, Mine H, Nagai T, Asakuma Y, Hagiwara S, Matsui S, Watanabe T, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Chiba Y, Kudo M. World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan 14; 23(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 28127206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Local recurrence of diminutive colorectal polyps after cold forceps polypectomy with jumbo forceps followed by magnified narrow-band imaging: a multicenter prospective study. Kuwai T, Yamada T, Toyokawa T, Iwase H, Kudo T, Esaka N, Ohta H, Yamashita H, Hosoda Y, Watanabe N, Harada N. Endoscopy; 2019 Mar 14; 51(3):253-260. PubMed ID: 30674046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Jung YS, Park CH, Nam E, Eun CS, Park DI, Han DS. Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar 14; 32(3):1149-1159. PubMed ID: 28812188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps. Li D, Wang W, Xie J, Liu G, Wang R, Jiang C, Ye Z, Xu B, He X, Hong D. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar 14; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate. Van J, Alsayid M, Ma K, Vemulapalli K, Rex D, Melson J. Am J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 01; 118(8):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 37040556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cold polypectomy techniques for small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Abuelazm M, Awad AK, Mohamed I, Mahmoud A, Shaikhkhalil H, Shaheen N, Abdelwahab O, Afifi AM, Abdelazeem B, Othman MO. Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Oct 01; 39(10):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 37735986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cold snare versus cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of diminutive polyps: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W, Sharma S, Acharya A, Farooq U, Agarwal A, Aziz M, Chuang J, Kumar A, Schlachterman A, Loren D, Kowalski T, Adler D. Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Jul 01; 98(1):7-18.e4. PubMed ID: 36907527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of complete cold forceps polypectomy resection rate for 3- to 5-mm colorectal polyps. Yamasaki Y, Harada K, Yamamoto S, Yasutomi E, Hirai M, Ohmori M, Oka S, Inokuchi T, Kinugasa H, Sugihara Y, Takahara M, Hiraoka S, Tanaka T, Mitsuhashi T, Okada H. Dig Endosc; 2021 Sep 01; 33(6):948-954. PubMed ID: 33211353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY. Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar 01; 79(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 24125514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy: A meta-analysis. Qu J, Jian H, Li L, Zhang Y, Feng B, Li Z, Zuo X. J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jan 01; 34(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 30176072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps. Desai S, Gupta S, Copur-Dahi N, Krinsky ML. Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar 01; 34(3):1206-1213. PubMed ID: 31183796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study. Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Ito T, Aoi K, Nagai K, Kanesaka T, Matsui F, Fujii M, Akasaka T, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Tomita Y, Ito Y, Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N. Endoscopy; 2017 Mar 01; 49(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28192823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of narrow-band imaging in predicting colonoscopy surveillance intervals and histology of distal diminutive polyps: results from a multicenter, prospective trial. Repici A, Hassan C, Radaelli F, Occhipinti P, De Angelis C, Romeo F, Paggi S, Saettone S, Cisarò F, Spaander M, Sharma P, Kuipers EJ. Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jul 01; 78(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23582472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps. Jung YS, Park JH, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, Sohn JH, Park DI. Endoscopy; 2013 Dec 01; 45(12):1024-9. PubMed ID: 23921846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]