These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 26358693

  • 1. Reproducibility of functional aortic analysis using magnetic resonance imaging: the MESA.
    Noda C, Ambale Venkatesh B, Ohyama Y, Liu CY, Chamera E, Redheuil A, Teixido-Tura G, Chugh AR, Wu CO, Hundley GW, Bluemke DA, Lima JA.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Aug; 17(8):909-17. PubMed ID: 26358693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Measuring aortic pulse wave velocity using high-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques.
    Ibrahim el-SH, Johnson KR, Miller AB, Shaffer JM, White RD.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 May 11; 12(1):26. PubMed ID: 20459799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Quantification of aortic pulse wave velocity from a population based cohort: a fully automatic method.
    Shahzad R, Shankar A, Amier R, Nijveldt R, Westenberg JJM, de Roos A, Lelieveldt BPF, van der Geest RJ, Heart Brain Connection study group.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 May 13; 21(1):27. PubMed ID: 31088480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ten-year longitudinal change in aortic stiffness assessed by cardiac MRI in the second half of the human lifespan: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.
    Ohyama Y, Teixido-Tura G, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Noda C, Chugh AR, Liu CY, Redheuil A, Stacey RB, Dietz H, Gomes AS, Prince MR, Evangelista A, Wu CO, Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Lima JA.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep 13; 17(9):1044-53. PubMed ID: 26758407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Scan-rescan reproducibility of segmental aortic wall shear stress as assessed by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers.
    van der Palen RLF, Roest AAW, van den Boogaard PJ, de Roos A, Blom NA, Westenberg JJM.
    MAGMA; 2018 Oct 13; 31(5):653-663. PubMed ID: 29804208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Analysis of pulse wave velocity in the thoracic aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI: reproducibility and correlation with characteristics in patients with aortic atherosclerosis.
    Markl M, Wallis W, Strecker C, Gladstone BP, Vach W, Harloff A.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May 13; 35(5):1162-8. PubMed ID: 22271330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation and reproducibility of aortic pulse wave velocity as assessed with velocity-encoded MRI.
    Grotenhuis HB, Westenberg JJ, Steendijk P, van der Geest RJ, Ottenkamp J, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, de Roos A.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep 13; 30(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 19711407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Analysis of the thoracic aorta using a semi-automated post processing tool.
    Entezari P, Kino A, Honarmand AR, Galizia MS, Yang Y, Collins J, Yaghmai V, Carr JC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep 13; 82(9):1558-64. PubMed ID: 23680155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Dogui A, Kachenoura N, Frouin F, Lefort M, De Cesare A, Mousseaux E, Herment A.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Jan 27; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 21272312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy and repeatability of fourier velocity encoded M-mode and two-dimensional cine phase contrast for pulse wave velocity measurement in the descending aorta.
    Taviani V, Patterson AJ, Graves MJ, Hardy CJ, Worters P, Sutcliffe MP, Gillard JH.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May 27; 31(5):1185-94. PubMed ID: 20432355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry.
    Dorniak K, Heiberg E, Hellmann M, Rawicz-Zegrzda D, Wesierska M, Galaska R, Sabisz A, Szurowska E, Dudziak M, Hedström E.
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May 26; 16(1):110. PubMed ID: 27387199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of blood flow measurements on the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery using cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Di Leo G, D'Angelo ID, Alì M, Cannaò PM, Mauri G, Secchi F, Sardanelli F.
    Radiol Med; 2017 Mar 26; 122(3):179-185. PubMed ID: 27878504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comprehensive assessment of aortic compliance and brachial endothelial function using 3.0-T high-resolution MRI: a feasibility study.
    Shan Y, Lin J, Xu P, Zhou J, Zeng M.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Mar 26; 36(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 22805674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A magnetic resonance perspective of the pulse wave transit time by the Arteriograph device and potential for improving aortic length estimation for central pulse wave velocity.
    Rezai MR, Cowan BR, Sherratt N, Finn JD, Wu FC, Cruickshank JK.
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr 26; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 23324879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Left atrial structure and functional quantitation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and multimodality tissue tracking: validation and reproducibility assessment.
    Zareian M, Ciuffo L, Habibi M, Opdahl A, Chamera EH, Wu CO, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, Venkatesh BA.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Jul 01; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 26126732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. MR pulse wave velocity increases with age faster in the thoracic aorta than in the abdominal aorta.
    Devos DG, Rietzschel E, Heyse C, Vandemaele P, Van Bortel L, Babin D, Segers P, Westenberg JM, Achten R.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Mar 01; 41(3):765-72. PubMed ID: 24615998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Group delay method for MRI aortic pulse wave velocity measurements in clinical protocols with low temporal resolution: Validation in a heterogeneous cohort.
    Pahlevan NM, Yao T, Chu K, Cole S, Tran T, Wood JC, King KS.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jun 01; 69():8-15. PubMed ID: 32105671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison by magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging of pulse-wave velocity in patients with single ventricle who have reconstructed aortas versus those without.
    Fogel MA, Li C, Nicolson SC, Spray TL, Gaynor JW, Fuller S, Keller MS, Harris MA, Yoganathan AP, Whitehead KK.
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Dec 15; 114(12):1902-7. PubMed ID: 25432153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging.
    Donekal S, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Berkowitz S, Wu CO, Choi EY, Fernandes V, Yan R, Harouni AA, Bluemke DA, Lima JA.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 May 10; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 23663535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.
    Rengier F, Delles M, Eichhorn J, Azad YJ, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Dillmann R, Kauczor HU, Unterhinninghofen R, Ley S.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr 10; 31(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 25645544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.