These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1112 related items for PubMed ID: 26360240

  • 21. Screening for small for gestational age infants in early vs late third-trimester ultrasonography: a randomized trial.
    Verspyck E, Thill C, Ego A, Machevin E, Brasseur-Daudruy M, Ickowicz V, Blondel C, Degré S, Lefebure A, Braund S, Benichou J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101162. PubMed ID: 37717697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age.
    Price CR, Roeckner J, Odibo L, Odibo A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(20):3931-3936. PubMed ID: 33172312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 19-24 weeks.
    Lesmes C, Gallo DM, Saiid Y, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 46(3):332-40. PubMed ID: 25810352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Reduced growth velocity from the mid-trimester is associated with placental insufficiency in fetuses born at a normal birthweight.
    Kennedy LM, Tong S, Robinson AJ, Hiscock RJ, Hui L, Dane KM, Middleton AL, Walker SP, MacDonald TM.
    BMC Med; 2020 Dec 24; 18(1):395. PubMed ID: 33357243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Akolekar R, Ciobanu A, Zingler E, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul 24; 221(1):65.e1-65.e18. PubMed ID: 30878322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Sonographic growth curves versus neonatal birthweight growth curves for the identification of fetal growth restriction.
    Bergman M, Reichman O, Farkash R, Bin-Nun A, Samueloff A, Sapir AZ, Sela HY.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec 24; 35(23):4558-4565. PubMed ID: 33417530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep 24; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks.
    Poon LC, Lesmes C, Gallo DM, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct 24; 46(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 25988293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Implication of third-trimester screening accuracy for small-for-gestational age and additive value of third-trimester growth-trajectory indicators in predicting severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: pragmatic secondary analysis of IRIS study.
    van Roekel M, Henrichs J, Franx A, Verhoeven CJ, de Jonge A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Aug 24; 62(2):209-218. PubMed ID: 36704993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.