These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
233 related items for PubMed ID: 26383088
1. Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children. Jain D, Ghai B, Bala I, Gandhi K, Banerjee G. Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 26383088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of I-Gel™ size 2 airway in different degrees of neck flexion in anesthetized children - a prospective, self-controlled trial. Jain D, Ghai B, Gandhi K, Banerjee G, Bala I, Samujh R. Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27779349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children. Abdel-Ghaffar HS, Abdelal FA, Osman MA, Soliman OM. Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population. Gupta S, Dogra N, Chauhan K. Anesth Essays Res; 2017 Mar; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices. Park SH, Han SH, Do SH, Kim JW, Kim JH. Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial. Banerjee G, Jain D, Bala I, Gandhi K, Samujh R. Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Feb; 62(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29491514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children. Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim HJ, Shin HY, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 19(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19143960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial. Chaki T, Tachibana S, Kumita S, Sato H, Hamada K, Tokinaga Y, Yamakage M. Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar 01; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr 01; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Mankoo R, Langen KE, Mandler T. Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Feb 01; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21917058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. i-gel™ vs. AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients. Donaldson W, Abraham A, Deighan M, Michalek P. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2011 Jun 01; 155(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21804625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]