These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
233 related items for PubMed ID: 26383088
21. A randomized trial comparing the Ambu ® Aura-i ™ with the air-Q ™ intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Shah RD, Mukherji II, Roth AG, Suresh S. Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 22(12):1197-204. PubMed ID: 22971118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure? Jagannathan N, Sohn L, Sommers K, Belvis D, Shah RD, Sawardekar A, Eidem J, Dagraca J, Mukherji I. Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Mishra SK, Nawaz M, Satyapraksh MV, Parida S, Bidkar PU, Hemavathy B, Kundra P. Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2015 Oct; 2015():705869. PubMed ID: 25648620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Xue FS, Mao P, Liu HP, Yang QY, Li CW, He N, Xu YC, Liao X. Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure. Buckham M, Brooker M, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM. Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia. Yan CL, Zhang YQ, Chen Y, Qv ZY, Zuo MZ. J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Apr; 37(2):593-598. PubMed ID: 36308611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The LMA-Supreme versus the I-gel in simulated difficult airway in children: a randomised study. Kus A, Gok CN, Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Solak M, Toker K. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 24632572 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of ProSeal LMA with Supreme LMA in paediatric patients. Hoşten T, Gürkan Y, Kuş A, Özdamar D, Aksu C, Solak M, Toker K. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23809021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]