These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
282 related items for PubMed ID: 26384503
1. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction. Dumon T, Medina M, Sperling NM. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implantation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus the Epidermal Flap Technique. Dumon T, Wegner I, Sperling N, Grolman W. Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 27779562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone-anchored Hearing Implant Surgery: Randomized Trial of Dermatome Versus Linear Incision Without Soft Tissue Reduction--Clinical Measures. Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV. Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 25695686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome. Stalfors J, Tjellström A. Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1109-14. PubMed ID: 18758391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision? Strijbos RM, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3713-3722. PubMed ID: 27086360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques. Gordon SA, Coelho DH. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Jun; 152(6):1089-93. PubMed ID: 25715352 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction. van der Stee EHH, Strijbos RM, Bom SJH, Hol MKS. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 29846791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery]. Tamarit Conejeros JM, Dalmau Galofre J, Murcia Puchades V, Pons Rocher F, Fernández Martínez S, Estrems Navas P. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2009 Jul; 60(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 19909718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): skin healing process for skin flap technique versus linear incision technique in the first three months after the implantation. Mudry A. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Jul; 130(4-5):281-4. PubMed ID: 20597411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic evaluation of soft tissue integration of experimental abutments for bone anchored hearing implants using surgery without soft tissue reduction. Larsson A, Wigren S, Andersson M, Ekeroth G, Flynn M, Nannmark U. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Oct; 33(8):1445-51. PubMed ID: 22918110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A Systematic Review on Complications of Tissue Preservation Surgical Techniques in Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices. Verheij E, Bezdjian A, Grolman W, Thomeer HG. Otol Neurotol; 2016 Aug; 37(7):829-37. PubMed ID: 27273402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Successful loading of a bone-anchored hearing implant at two weeks after surgery: randomized trial of two surgical methods and detailed stability measurements. Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV. Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e51-7. PubMed ID: 25341064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A five-year follow-up on the osseointegration of bone-anchored hearing device implantation without tissue reduction. Hultcrantz M, Lanis A. Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1480-5. PubMed ID: 24770406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]