These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


282 related items for PubMed ID: 26384503

  • 21. Soft-tissue outcomes following implantation of different types of bone conduction hearing devices in a single centre.
    Ray J, Lau K, Moraleda J, Yardley M, Dawoud M, Dimitriadis PA.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Dec; 133(12):1079-1082. PubMed ID: 31779713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.
    Kim HHS, Kari E, Copeland BJ, Moore GF, Shaia WT, Cosetti MK, Wazen JJ, Wanna GB, Chang CJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jul; 40(6):e631-e635. PubMed ID: 31157720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.
    Xiao Q, Gong F, Wang N, Hu W.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 278(9):3171-3180. PubMed ID: 33389004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Adverse skin reactions following percutaneous bone conduction implant surgery using the linear incision technique with and without subcutaneous tissue reduction.
    Van der Gucht K, Vanderveken O, Hamans E, Claes J, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 137(2):149-153. PubMed ID: 27609549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Retrospective analysis of skin complications related to bone-anchored hearing aid implant: association with surgical technique, quality of life, and audiological benefit.
    Peñaranda D, Garcia JM, Aparicio ML, Montes F, Barón C, Jiménez RC, Peñaranda A.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 84(3):324-331. PubMed ID: 28506614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation.
    de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Huygen PL, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1100-8. PubMed ID: 18800022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial.
    Hultcrantz M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21817939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Osseointegrated hearing implant surgery using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated concave abutment design.
    Wilkie MD, Chakravarthy KM, Mamais C, Temple RH.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Dec; 151(6):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25245135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Has the use of the linear incision reduced skin complications in bone-anchored hearing aid implantation?
    Roplekar R, Lim A, Hussain SS.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Jun; 130(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 27160014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Experience of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in children younger than 5 years of age.
    Amonoo-Kuofi K, Kelly A, Neeff M, Brown CR.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 25680294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. First Report: Linear Incision for Placement of a Magnetically Coupled Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant.
    Barry JY, Reghunathan S, Jacob A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):221-224. PubMed ID: 28068302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Findings from the experience with the punch technique for auditory osseointegrated implants: A retrospective single center comparative study.
    Bonilla A, Magri C, Juan E.
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017 Feb; 68(6):309-316. PubMed ID: 28549683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: our experience with linear incision and punch techniques.
    DI Giustino F, Vannucchi P, Pecci R, Mengucci A, Santimone R, Giannoni B.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Jun; 38(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 29984803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Surgical and audiological results of bone-anchored hearing aids: comparison of two surgical techniques.
    Amaral MSAD, Santos FRD, Danieli F, Massuda ET, Reis ACMB, Hyppolito MA.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 88(4):533-538. PubMed ID: 32888895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Bone-anchored hearing device surgery: Linear incision without soft tissue reduction. A prospective study.
    Altuna X, Navarro JJ, Palicio I, Álvarez L.
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2015 Jun; 66(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 25554437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Long-term soft tissue outcomes for hydroxyapatite-coated bone-anchored hearing implant surgery.
    Kanzara T, Walijee H, Badar Sheikh R, Lau A, Temple R.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Nov; 276(11):3067-3072. PubMed ID: 31451899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques.
    Candreia C, Birrer R, Fistarol S, Kompis M, Caversaccio M, Arnold A, Stieger C.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4185-4192. PubMed ID: 27250841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Minimal access surgery for implantable bone conduction systems: early experience with the "Sheffield" incision.
    Ray J, Addams-Williams J, Baldwin A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1232-4. PubMed ID: 22872178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.
    Reznitsky M, Wielandt K, Foghsgaard S.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Feb; 276(2):349-356. PubMed ID: 30535539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.