These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
143 related items for PubMed ID: 26407196
21. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model. Cullen AB, Curtiss S, Lee MA. J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of fracture stability on the performance of locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures. Moazen M, Mak JH, Etchels LW, Jin Z, Wilcox RK, Jones AC, Tsiridis E. J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1589-95. PubMed ID: 23642449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fixation of long bone segmental defects: a biomechanical study. Talbot M, Zdero R, Garneau D, Cole PA, Schemitsch EH. Injury; 2008 Feb; 39(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 18164006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In vivo model for evaluating the effects of mechanical stimulation on tissue-engineered bone repair. Boerckel JD, Dupont KM, Kolambkar YM, Lin AS, Guldberg RE. J Biomech Eng; 2009 Aug; 131(8):084502. PubMed ID: 19604025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis. Rao J, Zhang J, Ye Z, Zhang L, Xu J. J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Oct 07; 18(1):759. PubMed ID: 37805559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors. Bujtár P, Simonovics J, Váradi K, Sándor GK, Avery CM. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep 07; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]