These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Randomised clinical trial: MRCP-first vs. ERCP-first approach in patients with suspected biliary obstruction due to bile duct stones. Bhat M, Romagnuolo J, da Silveira E, Reinhold C, Valois E, Martel M, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2013 Nov; 38(9):1045-53. PubMed ID: 24024705 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, Thomas S, Blakeborough T, Walters SJ, Bouchier H. Health Technol Assess; 2004 Mar; 8(10):iii, 1-89. PubMed ID: 14982656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging. Ang TL, Teo EK, Fock KM. Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Oct 15; 26(8):1163-70. PubMed ID: 17894658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs? Ward WH, Fluke LM, Hoagland BD, Zarow GJ, Held JM, Ricca RL. Am Surg; 2015 Jul 15; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP? Cavdar F, Yildar M, Tellioğlu G, Kara M, Tilki M, Titiz Mİ. Pancreatology; 2014 Jul 15; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]