These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

505 related items for PubMed ID: 26424348

  • 1. Unintended durotomy in lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: a 10-year systematic review of the literature.
    Ghobrial GM, Theofanis T, Darden BV, Arnold P, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E8. PubMed ID: 26424348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP, Smith ZA, Nixon AT, Lawton CD, Dahdaleh NS, Wong RH, Auffinger B, Lam S, Song JK, Liu JC, Koski TR, Fessler RG.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery.
    Ruban D, O'Toole JE.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Oct; 31(4):E15. PubMed ID: 21961859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
    Nandyala SV, Fineberg SJ, Pelton M, Singh K.
    Spine J; 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar 01; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
    Joseph JR, Smith BW, La Marca F, Park P.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct 01; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy.
    Wong AP, Shih P, Smith TR, Slimack NP, Dahdaleh NS, Aoun SG, El Ahmadieh TY, Smith ZA, Scheer JK, Koski TR, Liu JC, Fessler RG.
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Oct 01; 81(3-4):634-40. PubMed ID: 24239738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q, Xiao Q, Deng L, Li C, Dong X.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct 01; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O, Carr K, Thompson P, Hoang K, Darlington T, Perez E, Fatemi P, Gottfried O, Cheng J, Isaacs RE.
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May 01; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accidental Durotomy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Management.
    Klingler JH, Volz F, Krüger MT, Kogias E, Rölz R, Scholz C, Sircar R, Hubbe U.
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015 May 01; 2015():532628. PubMed ID: 26075294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.
    Wang J, Zhou Y.
    Spine J; 2014 Sep 01; 14(9):2078-84. PubMed ID: 24361997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Tian W, Xu YF, Liu B, Liu YJ, He D, Yuan Q, Lang Z, Han XG.
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul 01; 30(6):237-242. PubMed ID: 28632545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA, McGirt MJ, Garcés Ambrossi GL, Parker SL, Sciubba DM, Bydon A, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF.
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan 01; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes.
    Lin Y, Chen W, Chen A, Li F.
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Jan 01; 77(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 26091113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.