These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

917 related items for PubMed ID: 26426993

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Predictive value of log odds of positive lymph nodes for the prognosis of patients with node-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after radical esophagectomy].
    Yang M, Zhang H, Huo X, Chen C, Yu Z.
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 19(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 27215521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy.
    Wu SG, Li FY, Zhou J, Lin Q, Sun JY, Lin HX, Guan XX, He ZY.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 25440270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen SB, Weng HR, Wang G, Zou XF, Liu DT, Chen YP, Zhang H.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jun 28; 21(24):7514-21. PubMed ID: 26139998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Patients After Resection for Esophageal Cancer.
    Cao J, Yuan P, Ma H, Ye P, Wang Y, Yuan X, Bao F, Lv W, Hu J.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug 28; 102(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 27180928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in evaluating the prognosis of patients with pT3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Liu DT, Wang LS, Chen YP, Chen SB.
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct 13; 10(1):17161. PubMed ID: 33051518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.
    La Torre M, Nigri G, Petrucciani N, Cavallini M, Aurello P, Cosenza G, Balducci G, Ziparo V, Ramacciato G.
    Pancreatology; 2014 Oct 13; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Prognostic value of three different staging schemes based on pN, MLR and LODDS in patients with T3 esophageal cancer].
    Wang L, Cai L, Chen Q, Jiang YH.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct 23; 39(10):749-753. PubMed ID: 29061018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Log odds of positive lymph nodes predicts survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy.
    Ye G, Chen Z, Wang L, Hu Z, Bian Y, Yang X, Lu T, Zhan C, Lin Z, Wang Q.
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun 23; 121(7):1074-1083. PubMed ID: 32141098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Log odds of positive lymph nodes may predict survival benefit in patients with node-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
    Deng W, Xu T, Wang Y, Xu Y, Yang P, Gomez D, Liao Z.
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Aug 23; 122():60-66. PubMed ID: 30032846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes.
    Yang Y, Zheng J, Li Y.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 May 23; 48(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 34876328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Influence of number of removed lymph nodes on the TNM staging and survival in advanced esophageal carcinoma].
    Chen LQ, Hu CY, Zhang HL, He M, Meng XL, Ping YM.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Aug 23; 29(8):604-8. PubMed ID: 18210881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.