These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 2642789

  • 1. Early infective complications and late recurrent cancer in stapled colonic anastomoses.
    Sauven P, Playforth MJ, Evans M, Pollock AV.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1989 Jan; 32(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 2642789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group.
    Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ.
    Ann Surg; 1995 Feb; 221(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 7857145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Low colorectal anastomoses. An experimental assessment of two sutured and two stapled techniques.
    Templeton JL, McKelvey ST.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1985 Jan; 28(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 3882359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses--a controlled clinical trial.
    Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV.
    Br J Surg; 1982 Dec; 69(12):722-4. PubMed ID: 6756537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient.
    Brundage SI, Jurkovich GJ, Grossman DC, Tong WC, Mack CD, Maier RV.
    J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3):500-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 10498304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of stapled and handsewn anastomoses in patients undergoing resection for Dukes' B and C colorectal cancer. An analysis of disease-free survival and survival from the NSABP prospective clinical trials.
    Wolmark N, Gordon PH, Fisher B, Weiand S, Lerner H, Lawrence W, Shibata H.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1986 May; 29(5):344-50. PubMed ID: 3516601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.
    McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ.
    Br J Surg; 1985 Aug; 72(8):603-5. PubMed ID: 3896372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast 1977-1986.
    McManus KG, Ritchie AJ, McGuigan J, Stevenson HM, Gibbons JR.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1990 Aug; 4(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 2184859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Recurrence of colorectal cancer after sutured and stapled large bowel anastomoses.
    Akyol AM, McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, Murray G, George WD.
    Br J Surg; 1991 Nov; 78(11):1297-300. PubMed ID: 1760685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A Retrospective, Single-institution Review of Loop Ileostomy Reversal Outcomes.
    Zhou P, Hrabe J, Byrn J.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Aug; 62(8):22-33. PubMed ID: 27564436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses.
    Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J.
    Br J Surg; 1991 Mar; 78(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 2021852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of stapling and hand-suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis.
    Everett WG, Friend PJ, Forty J.
    Br J Surg; 1986 May; 73(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 3518855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Long-term follow-up of mechanical anastomoses in surgery of the large intestine. Prospective study of 683 patients].
    Athanasiadis S, Girona J, Gandji D, Gerlach F.
    Zentralbl Chir; 1983 May; 108(23):1502-14. PubMed ID: 6666425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: a multicenter trial.
    Brundage SI, Jurkovich GJ, Hoyt DB, Patel NY, Ross SE, Marburger R, Stoner M, Ivatury RR, Ku J, Rutherford EJ, Maier RV, WTA Multi-institutional Study Group. Western Trauma Association.
    J Trauma; 2001 Dec; 51(6):1054-61. PubMed ID: 11740250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Anastomosis to the rectum. Operative experience.
    Steinhagen RM, Weakley FL.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1985 Feb; 28(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 3882362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of stapled and sutured anastomoses in colonic operations.
    Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW, Leach M.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1982 Oct; 155(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 6750825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Some clinical and technical aspects of circular stapled anastomoses of rectum and oesophagus.
    Dickson GH.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jan; 71(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 2923423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J.
    Dis Esophagus; 2008 Jan; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Use of mechanical suture in anterior resection of the rectum].
    Vaĭsberg D, Mints Ia, Kaufman M, Ben Zeev I.
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1993 Dec; (12):39-41. PubMed ID: 8158949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The biofragmentable ring in intestinal surgery.
    Gullichsen R.
    Eur J Surg Suppl; 1993 Dec; (569):1-31. PubMed ID: 7683222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.