These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

342 related items for PubMed ID: 26428833

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pulse-spreading harmonic complex as an alternative carrier for vocoder simulations of cochlear implants.
    Mesnildrey Q, Hilkhuysen G, Macherey O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):986-91. PubMed ID: 26936577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.
    Goehring T, Bolner F, Monaghan JJ, van Dijk B, Zarowski A, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():183-194. PubMed ID: 27913315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D, Schwalje A, Gantz B, Choi I.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Precedence based speech segregation in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Hossain S, Montazeri V, Assmann PF, Litovsky RY.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):EL545-50. PubMed ID: 26723365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.
    Nogueira W, Rode T, Büchner A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 26936556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners (L).
    Kokkinakis K, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1099-102. PubMed ID: 21895052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B, Klenzner T, Oehler M.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.