These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
170 related items for PubMed ID: 26431476
1. The Usefulness of Gaze Tracking as an Index of Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients. Ishiyama Y, Murata H, Asaoka R. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6233-6. PubMed ID: 26431476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma. Ishiyama Y, Murata H, Mayama C, Asaoka R. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov 11; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the Reliability of Glaucomatous Visual Field for the Accurate Assessment of Progression Using the Gaze-Tracking and Reliability Indices. Asaoka R, Fujino Y, Aoki S, Matsuura M, Murata H. Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019 Nov 11; 2(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 32672604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Usefulness of Humphrey Perimetry Gaze Tracking for Evaluating Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma. Ishiyama Y, Murata H, Hirasawa H, Asaoka R. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Dec 01; 56(13):7801-7805. PubMed ID: 26650899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The association between ocular surface measurements with visual field reliability indices and gaze tracking results in preperimetric glaucoma. Arai T, Murata H, Matsuura M, Usui T, Asaoka R. Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr 01; 102(4):525-530. PubMed ID: 28765147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study. Tan NYQ, Tham YC, Koh V, Nguyen DQ, Cheung CY, Aung T, Wong TY, Cheng CY. Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan 01; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Relationship Between Visual Acuity and the Reproducibility of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucoma Patients. Matsuura M, Hirasawa K, Murata H, Asaoka R. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Aug 01; 56(9):5630-5. PubMed ID: 26313298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual field progression in glaucoma: what is the specificity of the Guided Progression Analysis? Artes PH, O'Leary N, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC, Crabb DP. Ophthalmology; 2014 Oct 01; 121(10):2023-7. PubMed ID: 24878173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability. Yohannan J, Wang J, Brown J, Chauhan BC, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Ramulu PY. Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov 01; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Standard Reliability and Gaze Tracking Metrics in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects. Camp AS, Long CP, Patella VM, Proudfoot JA, Weinreb RN. Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb 01; 234():91-98. PubMed ID: 34280366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Early Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Pointwise Linear Regression With Binomial Test in the Central 10 Degrees. Asano S, Murata H, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, Asaoka R. Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar 01; 199():140-149. PubMed ID: 30465746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma. Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Ophthalmology; 2011 Feb 01; 118(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 20728941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma. Rao HL, Yadav RK, Begum VU, Addepalli UK, Choudhari NS, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan 01; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Progression pattern of initial parafoveal scotomas in glaucoma. Su D, Park SC, Simonson JL, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar 01; 120(3):520-527. PubMed ID: 23149129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Usefulness of gaze tracking during perimetry in glaucomatous eyes]. Kunimatsu S, Suzuki Y, Shirato S, Araie M. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Oct 01; 103(10):748-53. PubMed ID: 10554550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis. Park SC, Kung Y, Su D, Simonson JL, Furlanetto RL, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug 01; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May 01; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clustering visual field test points based on rates of progression to improve the prediction of future damage. Hirasawa K, Murata H, Hirasawa H, Mayama C, Asaoka R. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct 23; 55(11):7681-5. PubMed ID: 25342611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Applying "Lasso" Regression to Predict Future Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression in the Central 10 Degrees. Fujino Y, Murata H, Mayama C, Matsuo H, Asaoka R. J Glaucoma; 2017 Feb 23; 26(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 27811574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Association Between Visual Field Reliability Indices and Cognitive Impairment in Glaucoma Patients. Raman P, Khy Ching Y, Sivagurunathan PD, Ramli N, Mohd Khalid KH. J Glaucoma; 2019 Aug 23; 28(8):685-690. PubMed ID: 31033782 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]