These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 26433387

  • 1. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children less than 20 kg by weight: single-center experience.
    Ganpule A, Jairath A, Singh A, Mishra S, Sabnis R, Desai M.
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1867-73. PubMed ID: 26433387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Weise ES, Winfield HN.
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.
    O'Brien ST, Shukla AR.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21616719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?
    Kafka IZ, Kocherov S, Jaber J, Chertin B.
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2019 Mar; 35(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 30643964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
    Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, Guttilla A, Sancaktutar AA, Haid B, Waldert M, Goyal A, Serefoglu EC, Baldassarre E, Manzoni G, Radford A, Subramaniam R, Cherian A, Hoebeke P, Jacobs M, Rocco B, Yuriy R, Zattoni F, Kocvara R, Koh CJ.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants.
    Chandrasekharam VVS, Babu R.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 33812779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Laparoscopic Approaches for Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Children With Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Critical Analysis of 11-Year Experiences in a Single Surgeon.
    Liu D, Zhou H, Ma L, Zhou X, Cao H, Tao T, Luo X, Chen S.
    Urology; 2017 Mar; 101():50-55. PubMed ID: 27765585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.