These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
645 related items for PubMed ID: 26440691
1. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies. Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term. Souter V, Painter I, Sitcov K, Caughey AB. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort. Lappen JR, Hackney DN, Bailit JL. Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term. Wolfe H, Timofeev J, Tefera E, Desale S, Driggers RW. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Kawakita T, Iqbal SN, Huang CC, Reddy UM. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks from a Statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative. Langen ES, Schiller AJ, Moore K, Jiang C, Bourdeau A, Morgan DM, Low LK. Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1281-e1287. PubMed ID: 36796400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies. Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women. Sinkey RG, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Ausbeck E, Subramaniam A, Neely CL, Casey BM, Tita AT. Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study. Lee VR, Darney BG, Snowden JM, Main EK, Gilbert W, Chung J, Caughey AB. BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26840780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Childhood health and education outcomes following early term induction for large-for-gestational age: A population-based record linkage study. Ibiebele I, Bowen JR, Nippita TA, Morris JM, Ford JB. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Apr; 98(4):423-432. PubMed ID: 30511739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk. Sinkey RG, Lacevic J, Reljic T, Hozo I, Gibson KS, Odibo AO, Djulbegovic B, Lockwood CJ. PLoS One; 2018 Apr; 13(4):e0193169. PubMed ID: 29694344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hersh AR, Skeith AE, Sargent JA, Caughey AB. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]